Skip to comments.
The Federal Budget is NOT like a Household Budget: Here's Why
Naked Capitalism ^
| 02/11/2010
| L. Randall Wray, a Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City
Posted on 02/11/2010 8:51:59 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I would have to ask why is the gvernment bankrupting our country, maybe they should be held to a higher standard, the household..
To: SeekAndFind
This one is setting off my BS meter.
3
posted on
02/11/2010 8:56:16 AM PST
by
henkster
(A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
To: SeekAndFind
Is this writer-clown serious?
Please keep the writer away from real life things, like science, engineering, etc.
Oh, he would make a good global warming expert.
4
posted on
02/11/2010 8:56:19 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
To: aeonspromise
5
posted on
02/11/2010 8:57:09 AM PST
by
achilles2000
(Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
To: henkster
this is often a good tip-off :
“ ‘Professor’ of Economics “
6
posted on
02/11/2010 8:57:57 AM PST
by
WOBBLY BOB
(ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
To: SeekAndFind
But only a moron would refuse to accept dollars today on the belief that at some unknown date in the hypothetical and distant future their value might be less than todays value.
and what moron would give this jack @$$ a degree in economics?!?@?
7
posted on
02/11/2010 8:59:29 AM PST
by
Nat Turner
(Escaped from NY in 1983 and not ever going back....)
To: achilles2000
Poorly reasoned article.
I posted this article PRECISELY to elicit arguments explaining why his reasoning is flawed. Maybe you'd like to get or keep the ball rolling by critiquing at least one or two of his points.... Thanks.
To: SeekAndFind
Krugman is making the same argument, yet when Bush was president and cut taxes he said the much smaller deficits would kill us. Those that want more government support deficits for that and eventual tax increases but not for tax cuts, and vice versa with tax cuts. I bet this guy is for tax increases.
This guy talks like we can avoid recessions forever.
9
posted on
02/11/2010 9:00:34 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
(( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
To: SeekAndFind
forbade states from interfering with interstate trade (for example, through taxation), If I buy an item from Cabela's in Nebraska, my state (Indiana) is going to levy sales tax on that purchase.
10
posted on
02/11/2010 9:00:41 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(Any man over 35 with washboard abds is either gay or a narcissist.)
To: SeekAndFind
If this was all true, then the government could spend 100 times what they are now and everything would be better.
11
posted on
02/11/2010 9:00:44 AM PST
by
Codeflier
(Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
To: SeekAndFind
Too educated for his own good?
12
posted on
02/11/2010 9:01:08 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
(The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
To: Nat Turner
But only a moron would refuse to accept dollars today on the belief that at some unknown date in the hypothetical and distant future their value might be less than todays value.
A wise person would continue to monitor the debt situation and then start HEDGING his investment by diversifying into other currencies. He seems to be calling a lot of investment managers in the USA and government of other countries who are doing this right now ( e.g. China ) morons.
Yes, he's the only bright guy /s
To: SeekAndFind
Does the learned professor understand that at some point the accumulated debt will have to be paid off and that simply printing additional dollars will devalue the currency?
Typical Keynesian.
14
posted on
02/11/2010 9:02:40 AM PST
by
mgstarr
("Some of us drink because we're not poets." Arthur (1981))
To: SeekAndFind
And here’s reason number 6:
Eventually you can tell your deadbeat son-in-law to get off your couch and go get a job, otherwise he doesn’t eat at your table and can leave your house. You don’t care whether he votes for you.
15
posted on
02/11/2010 9:03:35 AM PST
by
keepitreal
( Don't tread on me.)
To: SeekAndFind
He’s got some minor valid points, but his presentation is just ludicrous. True, no private household lasts for 230 years (although private corporations do), but that does not mean the comparison is invalid. The point is the same: spending more than you take in is a horribly stupid idea in the long term. Putting it in household budget terms helps Joe Sixpack and Sally Seamstress to understand how grotesque the situation is, even though they have literally trillions to spend.
To: SeekAndFind
The United States has also experienced six periods of depression. The depressions began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893, and 1929. The author missed one.
17
posted on
02/11/2010 9:05:48 AM PST
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: SeekAndFind
The United States has also experienced six periods of depression. The Great Depression so poisoned the word "depression" that every economic drop since then has been merely called a "recession". It's like saying "passed away" instead of "died". The result is still a burial.
Now with that being said, find any surpluses before the recessions of the last 60 years of the 20th century.
18
posted on
02/11/2010 9:07:33 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Special SOTU tagline: YOU LIE!)
To: SeekAndFind
But only a moron would refuse to accept dollars today on the belief that at some unknown date in the hypothetical and distant future their value might be less than todays value. If you have dollars you dont want, please send them to me.That's exactly what happens though. People stop accepting worthless currency and ask for hard currency - or gold. Legal Tender laws make this difficult for shopkeepers - but the rest of us will start making dollar-less deals if and when the dollar becomes a wheelbarrow currency.
There is nothing hypothetical or distant about the moment when America's debt service passes its one-year assets. It's what, two years off? The only variable is how mangy the other world economies will look in comparison at that time.
For instance, we in the UK will get to technical sovereign default before the US. And Greece got there ages ago - however they can't devalue their currency - so I imagine that the entire Eurozone will take the hit. And if the Eurozone crashes then the Pound will miraculously become the tallest pygmy in Europe.
To: SeekAndFind
Glad I didn’t go to UMKC for my Econ degree.
20
posted on
02/11/2010 9:08:29 AM PST
by
SoDak
(bitter clinger)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson