Posted on 02/11/2010 8:26:49 AM PST by BornToBeAmerican
“I have never met a paulbot that wasn’t a truther.”
I’ve met several. I have however NOT met a truther that wasn’t a fan of Ron Paul.
Well, I’m sure the Perry people are pleased as punch. This may help them avoid a runoff.
As I said, all she said was that it wasn't important to the Texas election.
Ummm..., yeah! A nice political "side step"... that's all...
If you cannot vehemently deny that you are a “Truther”, then you will not get my vote.
Spin this!
I’ve met several. I have however NOT met a truther that wasn’t a fan of Ron Paul.
Okay... that's another interesting "take" on it... :-)
Agreed, but of the two Perry will be better. Can’t believe it, I just started looking into her last night with her recent polling surge. Can’t believe it...a truther.
I agree ... but only if by "she was keeping open mind" she meant "she was really, really STUPID
LOL ...
So how is it relevant to Texas?
If she had said NO, Perry voters would have condemned her? Rick Perry voters or were you referring to another Perry from a distant planet? I’m a likely Perry voter and I would expect anyone to say NO because that is the truth and because it’s a great way to establish one’s sanity to the general public.
The only people that will be upset with that answer wouldn’t vote for Perry if he ran unopposed.
>> “Do you believe the US Govt had anything to do with 9/11?” and she said some have asked valid questions and they have not been adequately answered so she was keeping an open mind. [...] Beck similarly embarrassed Sarah Palin. He can be a goon sometimes
I don’t know what Beck said to Palin ... but the question posed to Medina is hardly a trick question. The answer is “no”. Anyone who doesn’t simply say “no” should be completely ineligible for office, and will never receive my vote.
“I’m keeping an open mind” is unequivocally the WRONG answer. She’s lost any possibility of winning my vote.
SnakeDoc
“......after the interview he was ready to have a homosexual relationship with Perry.”
LMAO!! Yeah, that was the best part of the interview, which may give an indication of how things went for her during the discussion.
Just ‘cause she isn’t Perry, is no reason to vote for her if she’s damaged goods. We’re not talking about her qualifications for running a medical billing service though. Nothing wrong with that, but this job description is way different than what her experience (and intellectual qualities) seem to suggest.
It just goes to prove that, no matter what the situation, it can always get worse.
Hear, hear!!!! We must vet closely those who are running or ‘attaching’ themselves to the movement. And I don’t even want to call it a ‘movement’. We’re ‘the people’....from all walks of life...rising up for different reasons....with the country and Constitution as the focus.
There was a short blurb in the Tulsa World by one of their reporters that some of the Tea Party people today are former anti-war protestors. Think those are the ones that we are starting to find are not conservative.
I echo your sentiments to listen very carefully.
Amen brother. Me too.
When she would not give a clear yes or no when Glenn pressed her hard for it, I knew we were dealing with a flake.
It’s too bad. She had some other great ideas but all it takes is someone in office who is unstable and who can turn on the electorate in a heartbeat.
I was going to vote for her until about 10:14 AM today.
Me too.
My worst fears, she is not ready for prime time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.