Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Non-U.S. Citizens Voting in Portland, Maine - Public Hearing Today
WGME 13 ^ | Feb 10, 2010 | WGME 13

Posted on 02/11/2010 5:07:39 AM PST by como_1996

Non-U.S. Citizens Voting in Portland - Public Hearing Thursday

It is considered one of the most fulfilling duties of a U-S citizen ... the right to vote. In Portland that right could be passed on to those who are not U-S citizens.

Portland's Charter Commission will hold a public hearing Thursday on whether to extend voting rights to legal, non-citizens in municipal elections.

The Charter Commission is expected to vote on the proposal February 24th.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: newsomalia; newsomalia4bho; newsomalia4dnc; newsomalians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2010 5:07:39 AM PST by como_1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: como_1996
NO.
2 posted on 02/11/2010 5:10:39 AM PST by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

They call ‘em Mainiacs for a reason....


3 posted on 02/11/2010 5:10:44 AM PST by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09! WTFU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

Pretty much sums up the stupidity of the local government...


4 posted on 02/11/2010 5:10:49 AM PST by maddog55 (OBAMA, Why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Are they NUTS ?


5 posted on 02/11/2010 5:11:52 AM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

If these people want to take part in the making of the laws that they live under, i.e. voting for legislatures, executives, and judges, then they should become citizens.

Otherwise, they can just live under them and complain. Rights carry responsibiltities.


6 posted on 02/11/2010 5:13:30 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

How does something like this even come up for consideration?


7 posted on 02/11/2010 5:13:31 AM PST by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

Portland would need a serious ass-kicking if they allow this.

By extension, wouldn’t it be discriminatory to allow the vote only to non-citizens who happen to be within a geographic area ? By extension, if you allow non-citizens “here” to vote, you must extend the same “rights” to non-citizens who are “not here” (i.e., all people of the world).


8 posted on 02/11/2010 5:13:41 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
They are suggesting the same here in Japan.

Caveats: But only LEGAL RESIDENTS, with gobs of paperwork and photo ID etc. required when voting, and only for long-term residents of Japan who have both Permanent Residence status (kind of similiar to a green card) and are Japanese taxpayers in the local Japanese tax system, but they can only vote in muncipal elections. It will not be allowed for prefectural or national level elections. The theory is, if they pay taxes and are legal, they should at least have some voice in local elections.

9 posted on 02/11/2010 5:17:55 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (All polls and indications are that **FREE REPUBLIC IS SARAH PALIN TERRITORY**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

If this occurs then the next step will be to allow foreigners to run for election.


10 posted on 02/11/2010 5:18:35 AM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

portland charter commission

http://www.ci.portland.me.us/charter/chartercommission.asp


11 posted on 02/11/2010 5:19:21 AM PST by como_1996
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
The theory is, if they pay taxes and are legal, they should at least have some voice in local elections.

Wouldn't the same theory say that if you don't own property and don't pay taxes (regardless of citizenship) then you should NOT be able to have a voice in local elections that involve increasing and/or spending property taxes?

12 posted on 02/11/2010 5:22:21 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

IIRC, this is already the case in NYC school board elections.


13 posted on 02/11/2010 5:25:13 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN.....................a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Well, of course, theory is one thing. Establishe Federal and State law is another.

One cannot legally deny a native-born American citizen (or a naturalized US citizen) whether they own property or not, or whether they pay taxes or don't pay taxes or not , the right to vote if they are over 18 and legally sane and not a felon disenfranchised of their voting rights. We may or may not like that, but that is the law for now.

14 posted on 02/11/2010 5:33:08 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (All polls and indications are that **FREE REPUBLIC IS SARAH PALIN TERRITORY**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Yuo missed the point , He was making the point if you accept the premise then you go down a slippery slope.


15 posted on 02/11/2010 5:38:16 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Yuo+You


16 posted on 02/11/2010 5:38:39 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

This dilutes and weakens the votes of American citizens. I would be asking why Portland’s Charter Commission would want to do something like that. Then I would be asking how to remove the Charter Commission members behind this idea.


17 posted on 02/11/2010 5:47:39 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontap
I see.

Probably not in Japan. But probably in the USA knowing what their agenda is.

18 posted on 02/11/2010 5:47:56 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (All polls and indications are that **FREE REPUBLIC IS SARAH PALIN TERRITORY**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Well Maine and vermont are the only states that let prison inmates vote.


19 posted on 02/11/2010 5:48:28 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: como_1996

Nothing to see here, just move along.


20 posted on 02/11/2010 5:53:11 AM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson