Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Las Vegas Ron
You should be zotted for this thread.

For posting her own words? That shows your lack of credibility in future posts and your intellectual dishonesty. I'm just for pure small-government conservatism and nothing less. I don't put my faith in nobody that has said the things she said in this interview. Sorry to burst your Palin-bubble.

146 posted on 02/10/2010 7:32:55 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier (http://www.rlc.org/ (The Republican Liberty Caucus))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Engineer_Soldier; Syncro; freekitty
You posted an article that is over one year old and LIED about the title just to start a flame war.

From the link you provided:

Do you then favor an amnesty for the 12 or 13 million undocumented immigrants? No, I do not. I do not. Not total amnesty. You know, people have got to follow the rules. They've got to follow the bar, and we have got to make sure that there is equal opportunity and those who are here legally should be first in line for services being provided and those opportunities that this great country provides.

Your Title: Palin for amnesty.

Get lost troll.

202 posted on 02/10/2010 7:50:04 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Engineer_Soldier
I'm just for pure small-government conservatism and nothing less.

Yeah right, my cats a canine.

209 posted on 02/10/2010 7:52:17 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: Engineer_Soldier

It’s difficult to take you serious after you posted this on another thread.

“The Iraq campaign was the worst mistake we’ve made in foreign policy in a long, long time - if not the worst. If you haven’t been there, then you must rely on the whitewashed news that would be the only information you have. The Iraqi people were much better off under, and appreciated, Saddam Hussein. It’s none of our business what happens in another country if their own people support it and it doesn’t affect us (which Saddam Hussein didn’t). Our founding fathers would have never supported our invasion of Iraq under the false pretenses for which we invaded; we should have just left him alone. Saddam Hussein hated terrorists as much as we do. There was zero toleration for terrorism by Saddam; he would feed them into a wood chipper feet first just to hear them scream their life away. I know this from our interpreters who were all Iraqi nationals that lived under the madman. However mad he was, he was their leader and they supported him. That’s why Iraqis, not so-called foreign terrorists, fight us day-and-night to get us out of their land.”

12 posted on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:22:32 PM by Engineer_Soldier (http://www.rlc.org/ (The Republican Liberty Caucus))

You’re a nut.


232 posted on 02/10/2010 8:02:03 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson