Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nepeta
You make excellent points. A cautious and conservative approach would be to utilize high-speed trains for inter-city trips up to about 500 miles or so.
This could help relieve airspace congestion and boost safety while keeping people moving rapidly on a regional basis.
The trains need to be comfortable and in the 150+ mph speed range. This would require suitable rail bedding and durable bridge crossings.
We live in interesting times and we have to ensure our transportation capability remains robust.

17 posted on 02/10/2010 12:00:39 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Jays
We live in interesting times and we have to ensure our transportation capability remains robust.

In some places, I would think a high speed roadbed could be constructed parallel to the interstate highways in places where there is plenty of land around them. Tying these routes to both the air and automobile systems makes sense. Corridors of unconnected rail that only slightly reduce travel time makes no sense at all, which is what Fearless Leader is proposing.
28 posted on 02/10/2010 12:13:18 PM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson