Make a list that compares the two's positions on issues...it is undeniable.
That is one reason I am such a fan of GWB, and why I flatly reject someone idolizing Reagan while trashing GWB.
They are either misinformed, or are just lying.
See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2447797/posts
That is Michelle Malkin talking. She also left out a few things - like the people Bush had as advisers - Christie Whitman,for instance, also Bush’s shameless pandering to the corrupt government in Mexico, his persecution of American border guards defending us, his failure to do anything about the trade imbalance with Red China, his rampant globalism & trans nationalism, his opposition to English as an official U.S. language, his scheme to have an ARAB nation control our ports, his insistence that Islam was a “peaceful” religion, and tardiness in lifting the Presidential ban on North Slope oil drilling set up by his father in the midst of an energy crisis.
I hardly think that Reagan was culpable of HALF the idiotic policy decisions of this man and his administration.
The ULTIMATE proof was Reagan was succeeded by a Republican, Bush I. If his regime was as tainted as that of Bush II, that would never have happened.
AND, if I am not incorrect, Reagan had to deal with a hostile Democrat Congress for a good part of his presidency.
Bush II started out with a Republican Controlled Congress and lost it because of his idiotic policy decisions.
And FINALLY, Reagan was a great communicator with the common touch, he WAS America. Bush II could barely frame a coherent paragraph and was more representative of the elitist Yankee liberal class which spawned his father, than the face of middle America.
The media was no less hostile to Ronald Reagan and the people loved him.
Whenever I see that pompous blowhard Narcissistic Marxist Muslim sitting behind a Presidential Podium - behind him I see two men - Bush II and John McCain who helped put him there.