To: Jim from C-Town
This is a second story that was originally run in the middle of the night yesterday. I thought this was important due to the fact that it is a start of more bashing on smokers.
BTW: I am a nonsmoker. I quit a few years ago. But this is about as scientifically honest as Anthropogenic Global Warming. IE: Not at all!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2447343/posts
6 posted on
02/09/2010 9:28:09 AM PST by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Jim from C-Town
“But this is about as scientifically honest as Anthropogenic Global Warming.”
I'm wondering why we should believe any of this kind of stuff.
Seems like true science (assuming there is such) is allowing its credibility to be undermined by pseudoscience.
34 posted on
02/09/2010 9:43:16 AM PST by
KrisKrinkle
(Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
To: Jim from C-Town
it is a start of more bashing on smokers. Nope. This means the research grants to study "second-hand smoke" are drying up. Therefore, it's time to move on to "third-hand smoke."
37 posted on
02/09/2010 9:48:03 AM PST by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy goes only so far)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson