1 posted on
02/08/2010 5:53:57 PM PST by
GOP_Lady
To: AdvisorB; antivenom; Blonde; BornToBeAmerican; BroJoeK; Diana in Wisconsin; eddiespaghetti; ...
![](http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:0kSft4aLmHFSCM:http://www.bioteams.com/images/wall_street_jou.jpg)
|
To be added or removed from the "The Wall Street Journal" Ping List, FReepmail GOP_Lady. |
2 posted on
02/08/2010 5:54:18 PM PST by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
Doesn’t really matter if they let the original borrower keep the home or not. They can’t sell them for anywhere close to what is owed. If they take the home back they have to pay taxes and maintenance. Not foreclosing ensures the loss isn’t on their books, only the late payments.
3 posted on
02/08/2010 5:58:32 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: GOP_Lady
This one is scary too:
We are a loooong way from the bottom of this real estate crash.
4 posted on
02/08/2010 5:59:06 PM PST by
Zeddicus
To: GOP_Lady
The DemocRATS’ “affordable housing” fiasco sure jumped up and bit us on the @$$. It’s never a good idea to sell something to somebody who has no intention of ever paying for it. A “teachable moment”.
5 posted on
02/08/2010 6:02:13 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(If the CIA and NASA are going to "monitor climate change", why the hell do we need the EPA?)
To: GOP_Lady
6 posted on
02/08/2010 6:35:40 PM PST by
VRWC For Truth
(Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bail out)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson