Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Welfare becomes a hot issue in governor's race
Mercury News ^ | 2/8/10 | Ken McLaughlin

Posted on 02/08/2010 10:27:28 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Three decades after Ronald Reagan catapulted the catchphrase "welfare queen" into the political lexicon — and 14 years after President Bill Clinton helped "end welfare as we know it" — welfare has suddenly become a steamy political issue in the California governor's race.

GOP candidate Steve Poizner, the state's insurance commissioner, first raised the issue in October, declaring that welfare should be a "transitional assistance program, not a permanent way of life." And last month Poizner's opponent, former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, made welfare reform the subject of her first ad focusing on a single policy issue.

In the radio spot, Whitman picked up on a statistic also used by Poizner: California is home to 12 percent of the nation's people but more than 30 percent of its welfare recipients.

Nobody disputes the figures. And they're often cited by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who for years has proposed major changes in CalWorks, the state's welfare-to-work program. He is now threatening to eliminate CalWorks and other social programs if the federal government doesn't cough up additional billions for California.

But many welfare experts and advocates for the poor are crying foul over the latest rhetoric, including Whitman's on-air assertion that "California is the welfare state."

...

The reforms made in the late 1990s, Herald said, have cut California's welfare caseloads in half by providing child care and other services to help welfare recipients find jobs. "The notion that we're not pushing people into employment is completely false,'' he said, noting that CalWorks was put into place by the administration of Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, who's now chairman of the Whitman campaign.

"It's mind-boggling that this has even become an issue,'' said Jean Ross, executive director of the California Budget Project, a liberal think tank. "But I guess old stereotypes die hard.''

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: border; ca2010; california; issues; mcamnesty; mccain; megwhitman; poizner; rino; welfare
California is home to 12 percent of the nation's people but more than 30 percent of its welfare recipients.
1 posted on 02/08/2010 10:27:28 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They just like the weather there best... If you’re not going to be working might as well enjoy the beach and the sun at taxpayer’s expense.


2 posted on 02/08/2010 10:32:26 AM PST by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

remember Milton:

Look to Milton
Open borders and the welfare state.

http://article.nationalreview.com/319184/look-to-milton/robert-rector

A decade ago, Nobel prize-winning economist Milton Friedman admonished the Wall Street Journal for its idée fixe on open-border immigration policy. “It’s just obvious you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state,” he warned. This remark adds insight to the current debate over immigration in the U.S. Senate.


3 posted on 02/08/2010 10:39:00 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Pensions for State workers are just as bad.
4 posted on 02/08/2010 11:07:15 AM PST by Carry_Okie (They were the Slave Party then; they are the Slave Party now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
GOP candidate Steve Poizner, the state's insurance commissioner, first raised the issue in October, declaring that welfare should be a "transitional assistance program, not a permanent way of life." ...Poizner's opponent, former eBay CEO Meg Whitman... picked up on a statistic also used by Poizner: California is home to 12 percent of the nation's people but more than 30 percent of its welfare recipients.
The difference is, Whitman will do nothing about it but will ask for big tax increases to support the inevitable growth. No Demwits in office anywhere! Thanks NormsRevenge.
5 posted on 02/08/2010 11:17:18 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
CalWorks was put into place by the administration of Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, who's now chairman of the Whitman campaign.

I didn't know that Whitless is brought is being put up by the same creeps who gave us Schwarzenegger, but it figures.

What a mess that bastard RINO has inflicted.

6 posted on 02/08/2010 11:20:27 AM PST by Carry_Okie (They were the Slave Party then; they are the Slave Party now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
While I am not for unlimited welfare, I would rather see them go after some of the other spending problems, education for instance, giving illegals treatment in ERs(except for life threatening events, until they can be sent back to their home countries), over paying legislators, etc. Let's chop all CA state employees pay and lay off a bunch of them also.

We also need to have a ballot measure the returns the pay scale of legislatures back into the people's hands. For some stupid reason, back in the 60s, CA voted to let legislators raise their pay. Dumb mistake and I fought against it but the measure passed.

We need to repeal that and once again vote on each pay raise. You would be surprised how quick they would listen to us then. It would also be nice to have the same control over the feds pay.

7 posted on 02/08/2010 11:23:38 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

According to the article only 3% of the state budget is spent on welfare. I couldn’t find a detailed brakedown, but found this.

How about selling off the UC system. Get the state out of the higher education business and leave it totally to the private sector. You could put in a convenant saything they must take 70% of their students from California high schools if you want.

What’s the downside? I don’t see one.


8 posted on 02/08/2010 12:38:51 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

9 posted on 02/08/2010 12:40:20 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
California is home to 12 percent of the nation's people but more than 30 percent of its welfare recipients.

Have any of them mentioned the "I" word yet?

10 posted on 02/08/2010 12:42:13 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

you can mess with public schools and prisons ..

the UC system is like the 3rd Rail .. A tenured professor can do well... not to mention the vice pimples and above..


11 posted on 02/08/2010 12:43:21 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Chuck DeVore - CA Senator. Believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson