“Q: Unbelievable! Why was this guy not removed from this case?
“A: For the very same reason that heterosexual judges are not removed from cases sexuality.”
Let’s translate:
“Q: Why wasn’t this man, who suffers from same-sex attraction disorder, removed from a case involving the legitimization of that disorder as normal and healthy, when his status as one who suffers from that disorder obviously must and clearly does (given his past behavior) prejudice him in favor of the plaintiffs?”
“A: For the same reason healthy men who have no vested interest in the outcome of a case are not removed from those cases.”
That makes a lot of sense.
Another reason to remove him, of course, is that people who suffer from mental disorders cannot be trusted to think rationally and reason correctly. Oh, sometimes they do, sure, but then (as you can see from the writings of Camile Paglia and every person who suffers from SSAD) something comes along that tweaks their disorder, and off they shoot into irrationality.
He should be removed because no one who suffers from SSAD should *ever* be placed in a position of responsibility, in the private sector or the public.
Can you cite a court case the states that gays suffer from a "same-sex attraction disorder?"
Until you can do that, your opinion on homosexuality has no bearing on this case.