These are the two salient issues right now.
Obama is NOT natural born—his mother was American, but his father was British. Thus , what cannot be changed is that he is not the product of TWO American citizens, thus, he is not natural born.
Also, there is a lot of documentation that Obama and his mother had a slew of Social Security numbers. Why would that be? Why cannot these facts be brought out and investigated.
This man is less than fifty years old and we don’t even know what hpspital he was born in, in Hawaii.
We know where our earliest Presidents were born and where they grew up—why not this guy?
The reason we cannot let up on this, is that if is not eligible to be President, then all the legislation he signed or will sign becomes invalid.
And the Democrats who have hidden these facts are complicit in America being led by a usurper.
No birth certificate? That’s only one part of the issue.
The SS numbers and the fact that he is not natural born—those are facts that can be established and published without even having the birth certificate.
The “storyline” about Obama is BS. We need to know the truth.
And if the powers that be can’t handle the truth, that’s THEIR problem.
While I have stayed out of this debate you are quite accurate in the possible charge. If he did have numerous SSN’s and received Federal aid for it he is a felon. It should be easy enough to ascertain. Any school-mate of his at Harvard is more than welcome to respond.
++++ The reason we cannot let up on this, is that if is not eligible to be President, then all the legislation he signed or will sign becomes invalid. +++++
!!
This is not actually a fact. There is nothing in US law that states that a natural born citizens has to have any parents that were also citizens. The only thing that case law shows is that a natural born citizen is someone born on US soil. Period.
Also, there is a lot of documentation that Obama and his mother had a slew of Social Security numbers. Why would that be? Why cannot these facts be brought out and investigated.
No, there is no such documentation. There is documentation that there are other people named Barack Obama in the US. I have seen no proof that ties them to one person.
The reason we cannot let up on this, is that if is not eligible to be President, then all the legislation he signed or will sign becomes invalid.
Do you have any proof that the document (the state-certified COLB)that Obama provided for examination to various fact checking associations is not valid? Proof. Not suspicion, or wishful thinking.
The SS numbers and the fact that he is not natural born—those are facts that can be established and published without even having the birth certificate. The “storyline” about Obama is BS. We need to know the truth.
You already know the truth. He is a natural born citizen and eligible to be President. The problem is that you don't like those facts. I've read the affidavits by the PI's in Orly Taitz motion against Obama. None of them show, say or imply that all of those people are the same ones. Nothing.
Plus, Ms. Taitz apparently still does not know what the Rules of Evidence are, or that you have to provide evidence when you file a lawsuit. A list of similar names simply does not make it to the level of evidence. The majority of her pleadings have no substance of fact in them. They are mostly complaints about the way she feels she has been treated. Plus, she is attempting to force discovery when she has not proven that there is any thing to discover. Proof of the allegations have to be filed with the pleading in order for discovery to be granted. She has done no such thing.