[wintertime]

You already know the truth. He is a natural born citizen and eligible to be President. The problem is that you don't like those facts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Well! Gee! If it is so true and he is a natural born citizen then he should immediately release the documents and clear the matter up.

But...My goodness Obama is strange! Instead of immediately providing documents (that many Americans routinely produce for many jobs), Obama chooses to tie up federal court and federal judge time and use taxpayer funded DOJ attorneys to prevent their release.

That Obama is misusing federal courts and DOJ attorneys to prevent proving something so true ( in your opinion) is worthy of impeachment.

[tsprague1]

Well! Gee! If it is so true and he is a natural born citizen then he should immediately release the documents and clear the matter up. He only needs to release one document - a state-issued, state-certified COLB. He has done that. The State of Hawaii stopped issuing what you people call the "long form" or "vault" copy in 1981.

Obama chooses to tie up federal court and federal judge time and use taxpayer funded DOJ attorneys to prevent their release. That Obama is misusing federal courts and DOJ attorneys to prevent proving something so true ( in your opinion) is worthy of impeachment.

What lawsuits have been filed specifically against Obama? Almost none.

"But...My goodness Obama is strange! Instead of immediately providing documents (that many Americans routinely produce for many jobs)

Nice try. lol Why are you rejecting a valid form of ID that is issued by the State that Obama was born in? That the Governor of that State has affirmed that he was born in. And that the Director of the Department of Health for that State affirms that he was born in the state.

Are you under the impression that people for almost 50 years, in all levels of Government have colluded to ignore that he was born somewhere else? That makes no sense.

As for being a Dem. What I am is a genealogist and paralegal. I know what documentation is available and I know what isn't available. I also know what proof is, and what evidence is. All I've seen from the birthers are wild, highly inventive, suspicions without anything to back them up. Even the supposition that the document, that Obama so nicely provided for examination when he didn't have to, is a fraud has nothing concrete to back it up. The people who have seen it, touched it and examined it say that it is valid. Who are you to say that they are wrong? Can you provide any proof that it is not valid?