Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sageb1
In other words, it is not a matter of “being,” but of “choosing.”

So, you are officially going on record to deny individuals free choice? Going to stop there? Or go on to tell them that the food they eat of the clothing they wear is unacceptable also and the MUST COMPLY!

You see, it's a slippery slope that we find ourselves on in denying the free action of choice. I bet you and I will agree that the liberal food police are wrong. Or that choosing where to live is something the state has no parts of, but why do we disagree here?

I will state once more that I am against public action that are deemed obscene, or causing disruption on military ranks. I condemn that in every case. But I will not condemn for choosing, or being.

46 posted on 02/07/2010 10:44:57 AM PST by kAcknor ("A pistol! Are you expecting trouble sir?" "No ma'am, were I expecting trouble I'd have a rifle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: kAcknor
So, you are officially going on record to deny individuals free choice? Going to stop there? Or go on to tell them that the food they eat of the clothing they wear is unacceptable also and the MUST COMPLY!

What are you talking about? The military DOES tell soldiers what they must wear, what they must eat, et al. (both on duty and off duty)! People give up many of their rights and privileges when they join the military. That's the beauty of the all-volunteer military...

104 posted on 02/08/2010 4:50:34 PM PST by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson