Speaking of crocks, uh, Rasmussen asked about “other candidates.” Johnson would typically be considered one of those by the rest of us. Of course, to you and EV, Rasmussen could only have polled about Greyson, Paul, and [insert heavenly choir here] The Second Coming of Jesus, Bill Johnson—to make the poll fair and accurate. That would properly put Johnson in His Rightful Perspective, right? I apologize for blaspheming against His Holiness Bill Johnson I! Please don’t beat this tired ol’ body, Marse Dangus!
>> Speaking of crocks, uh, Rasmussen asked about “other candidates. <<
Yeah, that LOOKS really good on paper, but the reality is that “some other candidate” ALWAYS translates into “Under no circumstance would I accept the candidates mentioned.” It is THOROUGHLY deceptive to claim that someone did terribly in a poll when the person was even not named as an option in that poll.
>> and [insert heavenly choir here] The Second Coming of Jesus, Bill Johnson. I apologize for blaspheming against His Holiness Bill Johnson I! <<
What’s funny is that not only do I not worship Bill Johnson I don’t know Bill Johnson from a hole in the ground. I just know that Grayson is a Clinton-loving Democrat and Paul is third-rate crackpot named after someone who fanticized about the deaths of billions of people.
Like apparently so many Kentuckians, I’m simply glad to know there is another choice; I hope he pans out to be a strong candidate. Which is exactly why it is rank dishonesty to cite a poll that doesn’t mention as if it finds Johnson is non-competitive.