If Paul’s supporters are really conservatives there shouldn’t be any problem. They will go to Johnson, not Grayson.
If they’re not conservatives, it’s a different story. An interesting one, but different.
“If Paul’s supporters are really conservatives there shouldn’t be any problem. They will go to Johnson, not Grayson. If they’re not conservatives, it’s a different story. An interesting one, but different.”
Again, failing to answer the question: you wouldn’t support Paul if he won the primary, would you?
And you know my problem with what you’re doing isn’t that Paul’s votes will be split between Johnson and Grayson. It’s that what you’re trying to do is push a split of CONSERVATIVE votes between Paul and Johnson, and that will get conservatives nowhere.
Painting Paul as some sort of royalty is just as wrongheaded. When were Ron Paul or Rand Paul ever anointed to anything in Kentucky, or even Texas? We’re not talking about candidates who can do no wrong in the eyes of the party hierarchy or even party faithful, but the stink of Kennedy-style nepotism you’re falsely tossing at both good men (for purely political reasons).
I might not agree with Bill Johnson, but he’d at least get my vote before a Grayson McQueeg type. Disingenuous is the nicest word I can think of to describe your behavior.