You can only believe that if you think Grayson is some sort of shoo-in. Well, he’s not. Look at the intensity of support for the three candidates and it tells a powerful story.
And Grayson is the establishment candidate, a leader of the Democrats at Harvard in the eighties and a Clinton supporter in the nineties.
Was just askin’ No need to bite my head off.
If there are two conservatives and one rino, doesn’t that give the rino quite an advantage? I’m not assuming he’s a shoo-in, just pointing out that when the conservative vote is split and the rino vote is not, the rinos have a jump on the conservatives.
And then the intensity of the backing for the two conservative candidates inclines them to scratch and claw at each other and voila, deja vu all over again.
Just an observation.