What a tired, empty-headed response.
It's now Palin-bashing to simply ask whether a government official made a choice in line with conservative political philosophy.
The Cult of Personality reigns.
You want questions answered and so do we.
Who do you support for 2012?
How many times were you given the answer and you kept asking? Bottom line - you weren’t looking for an answer.
Cult of deception reigns.
And the fact that some of the Palin Fringe are simply not very smart or really knowledgeable enough to respond, so they do what a child would when confronted by the 'bookworm' - they revert to name calling and posting their little Troll Be Gone graphics.
FTR: I agree w/Palin's decision as gov to tax the oil co.'s. It's AK's oil, if Exxon wants it, pay AK citizens for it. (The argument could be made that corps shouldn't pay any taxes because they employ the local populace, other businesses spring up or expand a/c the favorable econ climate, but that's another topic).
When our nation was in its infancy it was sustained by money from tariffs paid by foreign imports. That can create a lot of problems in an imperfect world. And if corps are not to be taxed is it then fair to tax the individual?
If we're to have a govt, at any level, it needs to be funded. I believe it's the rate of taxation, not the tax per se, that causes much consternation amongst free market advocates.
Your questions are legitimate and politely asked. I guess some respond like a resident of Memphis in the 1960-70s might if one was sitting in a Beale St club and declared, "I don't care for that Presley guy, never thought he to be much of a singer".
Disclaimer: jla likes Elvis' songs and does not believe any of the words in the songs' lyrics should be "removed from our lexicon"