I have yet to receive a straight answer on this subject, which has always stuck with me--if she's merely doing what the Constitution of her state says, how is this a bragging point, which I've heard from her supporters repeatedly? And how is this some "conservative" position?
I can see I'm never going to get an answer, which should trouble some of her supporters, but doesn't.
So should the state be compensatd for energy exploration on it’s lands or not?
It’s a simple question. Maybe I touched a nerve??
Does that make it clearer for you?
You seemed troubled you can’t get conservatives going against a conservative.