The more I read your crap reply, the more you piss me off.
Judge Zatkoff’s legal opinions have been upheld by the USSC many times, especially in Rapanos v US. Judge Zatkoff has been rightfully considered a nominee for supreme court justice.
When the case was filed, Judge Zatkoff found constitutional legal grounds to let the case proceed. But wait, the ultimate legal genuis “JasonC” finds that ‘”liquidationism in finance” trumps the complaint.
Okay...
How about you present “JasonC” opinions before the United States SC. Oh, crap, you can’t because you’ve never stood before the USSC and you’re a blowhard who’s spewing out crap.
You just blew years of personal credibility on FR in a single night. Congratulations.