Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

January unemployment rate drops to 9.7 percent
Yahoo finance ^ | Friday February 5, 2010, 8:34 am | AP/Yahoo

Posted on 02/05/2010 5:47:16 AM PST by central_va

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The unemployment rate dropped unexpectedly in January to 9.7 percent from 10 percent while employers shed 20,000 jobs.

The Labor Department says the rate dropped because a survey of households found the number of employed Americans rose by 541,000. The job losses are calculated from a separate survey of employers.

The report also included an annual revision to the estimates of total payrolls, which showed there were 930,000 fewer jobs last March than previously estimated. The department also revised down its estimates for April through October of last year, adding another 433,000 job losses.

November was revised up, however, to show a gain of 64,000 jobs.

All told, the department says the Great Recession has eliminated 8.4 million jobs. That's the most of any recession since World War II as a proportion of total payrolls.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bhoeconomy; layoffs; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: central_va

Imagine the convolutions to cook these numbers. Don’t worry, they will be corrected in a few weeks. O simply couldn’t absorb the hit this week so the fix was in.


41 posted on 02/05/2010 6:07:33 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Mass. elects Scott Brown. NVA:" for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my birth state")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Good analysis!!

Another good one.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bloomberg-unemployment-and-potential-big-not-so-surprise


42 posted on 02/05/2010 6:07:53 AM PST by luv2ndamend (They call themselves greens because they're too yellow to admit they're reds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: central_va

” As the recession gets longer, more and more unemployed people get disqualified from being included in the U-3 calculation — through a separate telephone survey — that produces that 10 per cent figure. That’s because they stop looking for work.

So, the unemployment rate could actually improve even as the job market gets worse.”

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/bad_feelings_grow_about_employment_qLBIbzzim4KJITI9zj3ldK


43 posted on 02/05/2010 6:08:58 AM PST by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
Seems they happen to have found 500,000 jobs they didn't count!

In New Mexico, in the trunk of a car parked near Bill Richardson's office.

44 posted on 02/05/2010 6:09:00 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

When I logged on this morning, the AP/Yahoo headlines were as shown in the screen capture above.

Minutes later, the exact same story that was trumpeting "GREAT RECESSION" were now turned to the miracle story of ONLY 9.7%....

Do your own search on "Great Recession" and see what you get...just a few hours ago they were going doom and gloom...

45 posted on 02/05/2010 6:09:29 AM PST by GRRRRR (He'll NEVER be my President, FUBO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

They found jobs that were not counted. I guess it’s those ‘saved jobs”. barf


46 posted on 02/05/2010 6:09:34 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Last I heard the number was expected to go up and I recall a large group that was not being included. Think I heard this being discussed by Mark Levin.

To be candid, I believe NOTHING coming out of Washington. Even the CBO which used to be semi-reliable has been compromised to report rosy numbers on the Healthcare abomination.


47 posted on 02/05/2010 6:09:40 AM PST by RonboTex (Get off my lawn!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

yup! LOL


48 posted on 02/05/2010 6:10:01 AM PST by tiredoflaundry (I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I don’t know what to say about this. The brazen absurdity of this is insulting.

The propaganda coming out of this government would have made Stalin green with envy.


49 posted on 02/05/2010 6:10:08 AM PST by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Wow. I feel much better.


50 posted on 02/05/2010 6:11:27 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Was on job interview (first in several months) - when
told interviewer wasn’t employed he said wife had been laid off since October!


51 posted on 02/05/2010 6:11:53 AM PST by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
How can the rate go down when we have increasing number of new jobless claims?

The way I understand it, the number of jobless claims only tells you how many people were let go. Not how many people were hired. For example, if in November 20,000 people were let go and 10,000 other people found new work (or gave up looking, or dropped off of the unemployment rolls), the unemployment rate would go up (net loss of 10k jobs). However, then in December if 30,000 more people were let go, but 40,000 other people found work (or gave up looking), the unemployment rate would go down, even though claims increased by 10,000 (net gain of 10k jobs).

That said, the numbers still seem very "cooked" to me. I think the "gave up looking" part is a very bad and underreported part of the equation.
52 posted on 02/05/2010 6:12:43 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
Wow. I feel much better.

Feel much better about what?

53 posted on 02/05/2010 6:13:01 AM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Complete horsesh!t.


54 posted on 02/05/2010 6:13:58 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeddicus
The propaganda coming out of this government would have made Stalin green with envy.

I checked the left wing blogs, and they don't believe it either. They're even calling it propaganda. They're not happy. It's obvious the American people aren't going to be fooled by this.

55 posted on 02/05/2010 6:14:40 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Utter nonsense.


56 posted on 02/05/2010 6:14:47 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That unemployment is dropping!


57 posted on 02/05/2010 6:14:57 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: central_va

NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED PERCENT DISTRIBUTION 27 weeks and over Jan 2010 41.2%, Less than 5 weeks 19.6%

Dept of Labor:

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm

58 posted on 02/05/2010 6:15:09 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
and further information from the administration

War is peace
freedom is slavery
truth is a lie
ignorance is strength
taxation is liberty
Saul Alinsky was a founding father

59 posted on 02/05/2010 6:15:58 AM PST by Delphster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Hey and they re-wrote and re-organized the BLS reports. Cool.

Did you notice that the BLS also fixed the 2009 report by adding back 920,000 in ‘unemployed’ error they left out of the 2009 data. See it’s that easy to fix the ‘errors’ in the monthly BLS report and slip the whole revised under the radar with the MSM. Cool manipulations.

So if the 10.0% rate in December was moved up with corrections, probably giving a real rate of over 19% so the drop in January was huge ... or is it hidden under the rug until they ‘fix’ it in the Feb 2011 report.

Dumber than a box of Kenyans if you buy this crap. And then they re-wrote and reformatted the entire BLS report. I am sure that is just updating to make the ‘new improved’ report high tech, don’t you?


60 posted on 02/05/2010 6:17:31 AM PST by Tarpon ( ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson