Was it unconstitutional to give chrysler a loan in the 80s?
It is both un-Constitutional and just plain wrong to force one taxpayer to give another a loan, with the terms dictated by the Federal government.
Yes, unless you can show me article and section you find it in. Read article 1 section 8&9, and then Amendment 10. That explains what the feds can do and can't do. Anything else is BS.
Bailing out private business isn't listed.
I did a search for "Chrysler" and "loan" and I do not see either within Section 8 of the US Constitution... if its not in the US Constitution, its not a power given to the Federal government.
The Federal government thinks that if its not in the US Constitution, that its fair game... thats backwards.