Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

Exactly, as it my post.

Would there be breaking and entering? (to place the cross on their stones mean the cross-holder had to have entered the pagan’s stone circle)

Would there be actual **threats**?

Face it, you find the mirror image example to be offensive. But have no problems with it when your religion is the one committing the act.

So much for the ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ bit. Jesus would be ashamed of you.


147 posted on 02/06/2010 11:05:48 AM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: gogogodzilla

You are not demonstrating an ability to read and understand what you read. As I’ve said twice now:

“However, I would not be calling for “hate crimes.” Was there destruction of property? Was there breaking and entering? Were there actual **threats**?”

“However, I would not be calling for “hate crimes.”

Would not. Get it? Would not.

Now, Look at the picture ( you’ll have to follow the CDS link): the circle of stones is outdoors, not enclosed and the crossed railroad ties are outside of the circle.

If there are actual crimes, destruction of property (none in the case of the Air Force Academy) *breaking*(none in the case of the Air Force Academy) and entering(none in the case of the Air Force Academy) and *threats*(none in the case of the Air Force Academy), those might be pursued.


153 posted on 02/06/2010 3:28:50 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.) (RIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson