To: a fool in paradise
The price of a song ought to be equal to the marginal cost of distributing a new copy of a song Errr... no, the price of a song ought to be whatever the owner of said song wants to charge and the market can decide if said price has value to the consumers.
2 posted on
02/04/2010 2:28:30 PM PST by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Errr... no, the price of a song ought to be whatever the owner of said song wants to charge and the market can decide if said price has value to the consumers.
Why is that so difficult for so many to understand?
3 posted on
02/04/2010 2:30:52 PM PST by
randomhero97
("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
To: mnehring
"Errr... no, the price of a song ought to be whatever the owner of said song wants to charge and the market can decide if said price has value to the consumers. " I agree completely. You might be surprised how many on this very board don't.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson