Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

She opposes an amnesty. Just like Bush, McCain, Kennedy, Pelosi and Reid. The question is (AND THIS IS A QUESTION) whether she regards a “clear pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens” to be an amnesty when she says she opposes amnesty. I don’t think she’s been very clear at all on that point, and if you have a quote you’d like to show me, I would actually be very happy, even relieved, to be informed.


321 posted on 02/04/2010 9:05:56 PM PST by dangus (Nah, I'm not really Jim Thompson, but I play him on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

Are you ever going to admit that you were wrong about her already endorsing for the 2014 races?

“Are you going to post the news accounts of Palin’s endorsement for the 2014 South Carolina Senatorial race?”


324 posted on 02/04/2010 9:15:36 PM PST by ansel12 (anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: dangus
Even you have to see that our disjointed screed barely fits the English language much less the current debate.

Sarah isn't anti-legal immigrant. This is a smart stance.

She firmly believes that illegals need to be dealt with and that a blanket amnesty is not the way to do it. She tried to create a "disincentive" with the whole DMV thing in Alaska, but she has hinted at other things as well. "Back of the line for services", better enforcement of current laws, etc...

Not exactly a "round them all up and shoot them" policy you seem to be angling for, but probably a whole lot more workable.

325 posted on 02/04/2010 9:19:38 PM PST by Dead Corpse (III, Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson