Sorry to have to break it to you, Barry, but that is possible. But if there's any insinuation in your statement that we are not allowed to do both or all three, or even much more, you're quite mistaken!
A US citizen certain has the right to question all three of your assertions, particularly since all those you mentioned are supported with so little evidence that they certainly beg questioning.
Barry, your weak claims and support for your policies, faith and citizenship have many of us concerned that there are serious contradictions among all three of them. It behooves you, Barry, to lay sufficient evidence before the American people to demonstrate your claimed benevolent leadership, personal convictions, and adherence to Constitutional requirements. It is your vacillating on these points--though you clearly recognize value in making speeches and television appearances--that has given so many of us pause regarding those policies, faith and citizenship.
Your speeches and television appearances, almost always with TOTUS in tow, certainly give us the impression you have a strong desire to impress your views upon us, but why not reason with us. This is truly a technique and potential White House strategery that can win over doubters to your views and positions as no TelePrompTer can.
Lay out the evidence you use to impel your policies, faith and rights to citizenship. We truly do wish to see them. If you continue spending seven figures to lawyers to hide the evidence of things that motivate your being, we are overwhelmingly persuaded that you do not wish us to know what motivates our president.
We've seen your actions in others before, Barry. They are uniformly actions employed by liars, cheats, criminals, and people with backgrounds they need to hide lest there be untoward consquences. Those actions are speaking much more loudly than any honeyed oratory you can bounce off your TelePrompTer screens.
You stated recently that you "don't want an attitude" among citzens that would prefer to see you and your policies fail. I'll take you at your word about that, but what are you going to do about it? Will you persuade the citizenry to your viewpoints using soundly reasoned exposition of the fact and desired results, or will you move to stifle dissent, as with using appointees at the FCC to limit what may be said on the nation's airways? Will you use your copious media attention to make willing believers in your stellar wisdom, or will you continue use your justice department to look the other way when groups such as the New Black Panther party use armed thugs at polling places to intimidate those who would vote.
Until you change your ways, Barry, it's inevitable that anyone paying attention--and that's of course, more and more people every day--are going to see you for the inexperienced, unqualified, morally conflicted, incompetent you are, even as you pretend to be deserving of high honor.
HF
Typical usurper ploy. Strike with a half truth as to the entire matter of eligibility. Dumbats will surely swallow this because I have the persona and charisma that is beyond questioning.
have been thinking about your comment since this AM....What strategy would it enhance? Is there an Alinsky method that it would fit into? Is there something in the courts that would trigger this comment? Nothing seems to fit in my mind.