Your contention appears to be false based on the recent discovery of the text of Hawaii Territorial Law 57 in force in 1961.
See Hemenway's analysis posted by rxsid:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2423856/posts?page=1
"What in fact the territorial statute in effect before the 1982 statute sets out is an even greater latitude enabling and entitling persons to register a child for up to a year after its birth and to do so, if not attended by a locally licensed physician or midwife, for the parents or one of them to fill out the birth certificate or for a local registrar to fill out a birth certificate from anyone having knowledge of the birth. Thus a child born outside of Hawaii and attended by a non-Hawaii licensed health care provider or born unattended could get a Hawaii birth certificate nonetheless."
Recent discovery? LOL. The law has always been publicly available, and I read it. My contention is correct.
See Hemenway's analysis posted by rxsid:
LOL. If you want to prove me wrong, quote the text of the law, not someone else's worthless "analysis" of it.