Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2010 8:44:48 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AtlasStalled

Precisely why “THE TITLES OF NOBILITY” amendment was passed, banning LAWYERS from VOTING or HOlding ANY PUBLIC OFFICE. funny how it mysteriously disappeared after 50 years.


2 posted on 02/03/2010 8:49:07 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AtlasStalled

Full disclosure ... I am a lawyer.

I think there should be a revision of legal ethics codes to ban political contributions from law firms and lawyers to judicial election campaigns. It is a clear conflict of interest for the attorney, the firm and the judge — and in some cases could be actual bribery. Disbarrment is warranted.

Political contributions are harder to deal with. Attorneys and law firms have the right to influence their political representatives ... they have no right to influence judges outside of the Courtroom.

SnakeDoc


3 posted on 02/03/2010 8:50:43 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (Life is tough; it's tougher if you're stupid. -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AtlasStalled

Meanwhile, in the real private sector, investment firms are barred from doing business with a municipality for two years if a single member contributes a significant sum to a political campaign... even if they have no personal municipal dealings.

Once again, we have a government of the lawyers, for the lawyers and by the lawyers...


5 posted on 02/03/2010 9:13:31 AM PST by pgyanke (You have no "rights" that require an involuntary burden on another person. Period. - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson