By refusing to answer this simple question repeatedly “Do you think that you have promoted any other candidate more than you have Mitt Romney?” you show that you know the answer to it.
That is good, because I knew the answer before I asked you the question.
well you again eh
i believe i did answer all your repeated questions there parrot man - honestly i expect the next phrase you post to be “Polly want a cracker or something”
I reiterate one more time and maybe just maybe it will sink in: I AM NOT PROMOTING ANY CANDIDATE AT THIS POINT MERELY CALLING THEM AS I SEE THEM
Lets call them the Big Three shall we - Palin, Romney and Huckabee as far as i know all three may or may not want to run (at this point i would say they do but unlike you Professor X i cannot read minds).
i point out weaknesses or strengths related to articles or posts
live with this as an honest answer or go back to fantasy land where you apparently live and think you hold all the answers to the universe
once again you tend to ignore my statement which means apparently that you have no answer but just in case
Have i posted anything that is not true? by your lack of answering that statement and refusing to refute anything i have said in detail than this means you agree with me.
so thank you parrot man and try to have a good day