It isn’t name calling, it is revealing that you have a dishonest posting style that amounts to a lie.
You have never supported Palin, yet you have post after post of ‘concern troll’ type posting like you tried on this thread, on the other hand you have much good to say about Mitt Romney and it is given in a manner that also seems like it is always spontaneous and delivered for almost the first time, like you just came to some fresh pleasant thought about him.
I notice that you aren’t showing me that I’m wrong, instead you merely shifted to the name calling and childishness about glue and elementary school.
AGain i call them as i see them pal.
have i said anything dishonest? did she step down as Governor of Alaska? yep. Has she been tarnished by an unfair and ruthless anti- Palin media campaign? yep
do i honestly think these hurt her chances for President? yep
I initally loved her as the VP pick. it was tactically ingenious and really threw the Dems for a loop. However the media assault on her took a toll of which i think would be incredibly difficult if not impossible to overcome
you dont like facts and want to call them lies and me a liar that is your prerogative but it is name calling and immature.
just because i may or may not have posted anything nice about someone does not automatically mean i like or dislike them either. i am merely adding content to the debate and call it as i see it. if you cannot handle that and want to call people liars well that is your business.