Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/02/2010 11:57:54 AM PST by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GonzoII

Young women get pregnant if they get anywhere near a spermatazoa. Women at 40 often spends tens of thousands of dollars and still have difficulty having a child. Take heed young women.

And remember Sarah older women, and take heart, if God wills it, it is done!


2 posted on 02/02/2010 12:01:11 PM PST by Woebama (Never, never, never quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

Interesting. But I’d like more evidence.

All the women in my family had babies when they were in their forties.

One aunt was 47, and had just sent her “last” child off to college, when she conceived and had another (very healthy) son.

The info in this article could be misused to pressure women over forty into having abortions.


3 posted on 02/02/2010 12:01:43 PM PST by Palladin (Don't ask, don't tell--just run like HELL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

The exception to the rule will be the good looking girlfriend you DON’T want to have kids with. A real bad day goes like this : “Good news. You get to pay me child support”


4 posted on 02/02/2010 12:02:14 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


5 posted on 02/02/2010 12:04:30 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

Maybe but we went for 11 years with no kids and at 42 my wife up and has twins, go figure.


7 posted on 02/02/2010 12:08:04 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

I’m confused. There’s only supposed to be one egg a month. That’s 13 a year, or about 500 or so in a lifetime. What difference does it make how many eggs are sitting around?

And over time, I’d expect there to be fewer eggs left. If the first egg is releaased at age 12, and the last egg is released at age 45, that means 33 years of eggs, and 88% of those eggs would have been gone by age 41 anyway.

Is the study saying that as you get in your late 30s, you have months when no egg presents itself, because you are running out of them? I just don’t get it.


8 posted on 02/02/2010 12:08:57 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
Is more really better? After all it only takes one to have a baby. It could be possible that a woman's body is simply getting rid of unneeded ova.

Most women produce a single ovum per month from menses to menapause, over a period of at most 40 years. A woman really only needs about 500 ova yet starts with several million.

10 posted on 02/02/2010 12:10:37 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Is anyone in the 0bama administration competent at anything?!!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

I hope that this is true.

I’ve got 2 kids (with my wife ... its kinda sad that I need to say that outright), and broke through 2 different birth control methods to get them. It would be good if we were through 80% of her eggs ... not sure I need another rugrat (I kid ... I love them to death).

If a third birth control fails ... our next birth control method may have to be kryptonite.

SnakeDoc


17 posted on 02/02/2010 12:15:59 PM PST by SnakeDoctor (Life is tough; it's tougher if you're stupid. -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

What’s more, after you’re 40 it’s pretty hard to get used to married life. I used to think people should wait. Now I say “Jump right in, your chances are no worse at 20 than at 40.”


23 posted on 02/02/2010 12:39:15 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (I miss having a First LADY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

I don’t doubt the science, but it’d the darndest juxtaposition:

1. Folks are most fertile at 15-19; yet
2. How many folks that age are emotionally mature enough for parenthood?

It’s a pity we don’t peak at 25 8)


25 posted on 02/02/2010 12:47:29 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

I’m always hoping the old wives tale of multiple births skipping a generation comes true, only I hope it’s the first pregnancy and not the last...

My dad is a triplet, conceived when my grandmother was 36. He has an older brother 5 years older than him.


26 posted on 02/02/2010 12:47:52 PM PST by JenB987 (under God's Spirit she flourishes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

My wife and I have been trying since September to start a family. She is 32 and I’m 33. We are both in great health but we realize it’s God’s decision not ours.


28 posted on 02/02/2010 1:00:20 PM PST by TSgt (I long for Norman Rockwell's America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

So that’s why women’s chances of getting married start declining at age 25 and really go downhill after 30!

I’m 39 and I’ve never been married but would like to. Think I’ll start my search in the age 18 demographic because I do want to have children.


30 posted on 02/02/2010 1:02:29 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII; All

If any FReepers have some proven conception advice, this’d be a good thread to post it ;)


33 posted on 02/02/2010 1:06:47 PM PST by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
link to the actual paper
41 posted on 02/02/2010 1:44:50 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

This was the dirty little secret no one told the first generation of women to be urged en masse to “have a career first.” They basically thought they could have a baby any time they wanted and that there was no risk at all in putting pregnancy off.

Another thing not contemplated: some people do mull over what it’s going to be like to be an older mother (in mid- or late 30’s when baby is born), but I can guarantee nothing quite prepares someone for being that parent of a young teen when you are over 50 years old yourself. (Perhaps this is different for people who have already raised a bunch of kids and who still have teenagers when they reach their 50’s.)


42 posted on 02/02/2010 2:22:50 PM PST by fightinJAG (Largest wing in future Obama Presidential Library will be devoted to Bush & Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

A woman will only ovulate a few hundred times in her life. She will certainly never run out of eggs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/13/health/studies-aim-to-preserve-fertility-of-women-in-chemotherapy.html?sec=health&spon=&pagewanted=all
“”A woman’s egg supply peaks before she herself is born, with at least 7 million eggs packed into the fetal ovary. By birth the number dwindles to a million, and then drops to 300,000 by puberty””


46 posted on 02/03/2010 3:28:36 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson