Thanks for your input. I know that “rino” term gets tossed around an awful lot but I’ve never understood exactly what it takes to become labeled a “rino”. Does it take only one issue that isn’t in lockstep with true conservatives, or does it take two or three? I’ve read comments recently that said Hayworth was a “rino”. His record sure doesn’t look that way to me, so I’d sure like to know what the criteria is in order to be labeled as such.
Now that’s a very interesting post. Certainly not something most conservatives would say.
The term “RINO” has no meaning. In some cases it is no more than a term to describe any Republican not liked by the person using the term. Like all name calling, it is usually used to keep from making a real argument.