Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another lie by Harry Reid if this cloture vote is taken before Sen. Scott Brown is seated.
1 posted on 02/01/2010 2:19:02 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

Yet another proponent of “tolerance” and “choice” Democrat style.


2 posted on 02/01/2010 2:20:31 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Have I missed the the protests of the repugnican leadership ?
3 posted on 02/01/2010 2:24:13 PM PST by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
NO UNANIMOUS CONSENT UNTIL SENATOR BROWN IS SEATED!

GOP = Government's Other Party


We will throw out the Republicans, too, if we must!
No more two-party collusion! Defeat the Washington Party!
 
4 posted on 02/01/2010 2:24:35 PM PST by counterpunch (The Emperor has no Cloture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I thought the guy who was holding the MA seat was supposed to be out as soon as the election was certified. Why is he still allowed to vote? Should we contact our own senators about this?


5 posted on 02/01/2010 2:25:27 PM PST by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
“Just as U.S. Citizens cannot opt against having a congressman, workers should not be able to choose against having a union as their monopoly-bargaining agent.”

You mean other than the fact that congressional representation is constitutionally required and union representation is not?

7 posted on 02/01/2010 2:31:01 PM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

8 posted on 02/01/2010 2:33:52 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Reid is an ass and if possible,Becker is an even bigger one. No choice? I thought libs were pro choice.


11 posted on 02/01/2010 2:37:08 PM PST by wiggen (Never in the history of our great country have the people had less representation than they do today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

“Just as U.S. Citizens cannot opt against having a congressman, workers should not be able to choose against having a union as their monopoly-bargaining agent.”

First issue spelled out in the U.S. Constitution, second made up in his head. Oh ya.... there’s a balanced argument. NOT.


12 posted on 02/01/2010 2:51:21 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
"Just as U.S. Citizens cannot opt against having a congressman, workers should not be able to choose against having a union as their monopoly-bargaining agent.”

Is this the same line of reasoning which says, "Just as no American should choose to be against being 'Pro-Choice,' women should not be able to choose against having an abortion"?

Must be, with all the objection to Mrs. Tebow's story being told at the Super Bowl.

13 posted on 02/01/2010 3:09:23 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson