(1) I never said public parks and public libraries were unconstitutional — I said they were beyond the proper scope of government. They are.
(2) Parks and Libraries AREN’T rights ... which means they are not necessarily owed to the citizenry.
I’m less worried about the solution for cities than I am about the solution for taxpayers that are disinterested in funding porn access for homeless people (which, as I understand it, is a primary role of public libraries).
As always, private funds are at the behest of the majority — for parks, libraries, or whatever else they want.
SnakeDoc
Right, I'll rephrase. Parks and Libraries are not constitutional rights. It' also NOT a constitutional right to PREVENT government's largess spending caused by the majority wanting to spend the funds on what the minority think is frivolous, unnecessary, and a waste of tax payers monies.