Posted on 01/31/2010 7:57:46 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
This house looks like a 1875 (25 x 25 x3) square foot building, but it’s painted like a duplex. So is she in just half of it?
Our court systems encourage such behavior w/ regards to single (never married women w/ childwenz) and as in her case, divorce, child support, goobermint assistance for women, etc., etc., the whole 9 yards.
I personally know of 2 recent separations / divorce, where the woman simply 'wasn't happy', wouldn't work, constantly nagged about there not being any money, but never missed a week w/o going to Wal-Mart, Target, etc; and we ain't talking about grocery shopping.
Both former ex's (neither were cheaters nor abusive making $45K plus) now live in dumps still working and saddled w/ child support payments from fiscally irresponsible women that 'weren't happy'....that is seems they needed regular ccard excursions while refusing to live w/in their means.
Something is very wrong with society and the courts these days as the men in the cases I refer to were forced into basically poverty from court supported behavior.
Not so. It does happen often. During and after.
At least you can take part of the process. There ain't many mods going permanent, and many that do continue to be daily battles with the banks. But that's a different topic.
Sounds about right... I am in the same spot and going to do the same thing! Only owe 16 more years on a 9% loan with 89k payoff and we have a $1200 payment. I tried for a regular refi 14 months ago, the day my hours got cut to 20 a week... My credit score was a 720 and I was locked in that day on a 4 5/8% Loan. Now My house is only valued at 50k compared to the $250 it appraised at 4 years ago. The bank will not work with me. If they would just give me a current market interest rate and 30 years to pay it off, I could easily pay the 89k I owe them, without any government program... but they would somehow rather take my house and maintain the property for a year while it sits here getting vandalized and then sell it for 40k or less, we have had 2 within half a mile that sold for 17k after the gang bangers and tweekers stole all the copper pipes and wires out of the house, not to mention everything else including carpeting, cabinets and fixtures. Probably would cost more to fix back up than to bulldoze and start over.
327 Church St Royersford PA 19468
4 beds, 1.0 baths, 1,577 sq ft
Home Facts
Residence: Single family —
Bedrooms: 4 —
Bathrooms: 1.0 —
Sq ft: 1,577 —
Lot size: 3,923 sq ft
Year built: 1800 —
Year updated: — —
# Stories: 3 —
Total rooms: 8 —
good God! i’m not a very religious man, but my prayers are with you during these troubling times!
Congratulations. 53 here, 14 year old and a 2 year old.
Surely the $1450 figure isn’t P&I, but the whole payment including tax and insurance escrow, and probably private mortgage insurance. This is from the NYPost, so both real estate taxes and insurance are probably a good deal higher than they are where most FReepers are reading this from.
At the same time, the cracks of the corrupt government foundation spread.
Now that I lost have effectively lost my regular job, I get 10 hours a week if I am lucky, that is exactly what I am doing... Checking these foreclosed houses for the banks and photo documenting them. We get sent there twice a month to cut the grass and keep them in code compliance and bid on repairing any damage to put the house back in marketable condition. MOre recently I am doing more initial secures, going and drilling out locks and changing to a bank keyed lock and doing the same photo documentation interior and exterior... It is not unusual to have bids in thousands of dollars to repair. Really sad to see. Every trip back a new window is broken out. We have to bid to board it up, then get approval to board it a week or two later, go back and the house is destroyed. I have thousands of pictures.
I started doing this job back in March and we have two status homes, REO - Real Estate Owned - These we remove debris from and do monthly janitorial services, besides the yards, and PPO - Private Property, these houses we are not allowed to go inside (except after bid approval to re secure) or to remove anything from the property, it is all still somebodies stuff. I have had some houses that have been maintained for 10 months now that are still listed as PPO and they have been empty for the entire time.
Always go with your gut.
She undoubtedly didn’t get the whole 54K from the refi. The “fees” were probably in the 5-10K range.
“I make a six figure salay...All I do is pay back debt month after month, it drives me crazy...”
You lucky so and so. I would love to be able to pay back debt month after month.
Oh, well, maybe this will be the year I finally get a real job.
Or not.
The $1450/month presumably includes taxes and insurance. Most of the Philly suburbs in which you could buy that large a house, even in poor condition for $120,000 are super high tax counties (and you can be sure the taxes went up during the bubble and haven’t come back down) — the few who are actually paying taxes are forced to support the massive non-taxpaying underclass. In addition, given the age and condition of the house, there’s no way she could get/keep a standard insurance policy on it, so she’s probably stuck with very expensive insurance. Some insurance companies are quick to issue a policy in connection with an initial home purchase, and don’t even bother sending anyone to look at it — then they send someone around a year or so later, and send you a letter demanding thousands of dollars in repairs and upgrades, and cancel the policy if you don’t do them by the demanded date. A couple of years later, they send someone by again and pull the same stunt, demanding repairs and upgrades to things that are exactly the same as last time but weren’t mentioned at all then. Easily a third of that $1450/month could be taxes and insurance — possibly more. And she may have spent a lot of the $54,000 on repairs the insurer demanded, in addition to medical bills for one of the children.
The insurance BS is getting out of control, especially with certain insurers, and this woman doesn’t strike me as sophisticated enough to deal with it effectively. I have two homes in Pennsylvania, both 100+ years old — one is my main residence that I’ve had for 20 years in one of the nicer Philly suburbs, the other is a vacation home in the Poconos which I’ve had for 8 years. I’ve had the same insurer on the first home for the whole 20 years with NO claims, but they just issued me a non-renewal notice after I told them to go jump in a lake with their latest round of idiotic demands — e.g. paint the shed, which is an accessory structure specifically excluded from the coverage, and several other silly demands, yet no request to replace or even just re-shingle the roof of the house, which urgently needs it, and is now in the process of getting it all the way down to replacing all the wood underneath the shingles and adding insulation — i.e. I’m spending $10,000 to do something that’s seriously needed to prevent water damage to the house for the next 30 years, but they want to cancel my policy because I won’t paint the little shed which I plan to replace entirely in a couple of years. They cancelled the policy on the Poconos house a couple of years back, after I finally drew a line in the sand over this sort of nonsense, and I had no trouble replacing it with a policy from a saner insurer. Amazingly, my about to be ex-insurer has never had (nor requested access for) one of their eagle-eyed inspectors inside either of these houses — they just show up when no one’s home, walk around the house and write down a bunch of random stuff to prove to their boss that they’ve actually been there. Heck, if this lady in the article was home when they showed up, she could have spent the whole $54,000 on stupid stuff they demanded, and STILL have “The main toilet is broken upstairs; the roof is leaking into the kitchen ceiling, the ceiling is falling down. The floor in the back room is coming apart”, because none of those things were on the list of repairs demanded and made.
ltc8k6: re “what has the bank been doing since September 2008?” Answer: Counting their blessings that she’s been staying in the house and not trashing it herself or leaving it empty to be trashed and stripped by vandals — they’ve seen what’s happened to homes they foreclosed on after the ex-owners moved out, and they’re not eager to see more of that. We’re talking right next door to Philadelphia here.
I'd love it. Love putting the bullet through your loan shark skull.
Well, yeah. The bank apparently eagerly lent her $154,000 on an old fixer-upper house she'd bought a couple of years earlier for $100,000 and not fixed up. I'm sure not feeling a lot of sympathy for that bank. This lady doesn't seem like a paragon of financial prudence, but at least she's got the excuse that she isn't a banker.
Hildy, the price of the condo isn’t the only consideration.
Does the association have a sufficient reserve fund? Adequate maintenance funds? Special assessments looming? Stable annual dues? Well maintained facilities?
Take a look at the reserve study and the annual budget—make sure you are buying in a sound community/building/etc.
Yes Ex-Texan was criticized by many here and he was right. I started advising everyone I knew to stop buying and start paying off debt.
Most did not listen and were suprised by the fall, even though I warned them for over a year.
I still remember their mantra on FR “they aren’t making any more land” to explain how a crash couldn’t happen, yet it did.
I still find it funny and sad that people here will criticize someone for walking away from this, but excuse all the bad behavior of the banks and financial institutions.
???
I can’t make sense of this - - did this irresponsible scumbag buy the house for a place to live or as an investment to flip for a quick profit?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.