Angry voters track RINOs and incumbents

Renew America ^ | 1-31-2010 | Henry Lamb

[danamco]

From an e-mail today: From a Florida ER doctor  Having spent three weeks in a hospital in Naples, Florida with my wife I couldn’t help noticing what was going on in the hospital and I had a lot of time to talk to the doctors and nurses about what I had observed. Below is a commentary from an ER Doctor. Do you think this might be a big reason our health care system and our social security system are so screwed up? Do you think this might be a big reason our taxes keep going up? Who do you think these people are going to vote for? From a Florida ER doctor: "I live and work in a state overrun with illegals. They make more money having kids than we earn working full-time. Today I had a 25-year old with 8 kids - that’s right 8; all illegal anchor babies and she had the nicest nails, cell phone, hand bag, clothing, etc. She makes about $1,500 monthly for each; you do the math. I used to say, “We are the dumbest nation on earth.” Now I must say and sadly admit: WE are the dumbest people on earth (that includes ME) for we elected the idiot idealogues who have passed the bills that allow this. Sorry, but we need a revolution. Vote them all out in 2010. " --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[my small voice]

I pray this is true. I will be there to pull the level HARD!

[screaminsunshine]

My sister works in the Post Office. She tells me of these welfare Queens with 10 or 12 kids getting 60k a year. They do not work and have kids with several different men all unmarried. As soon as the females are old enough to bear children they get them pregnant and get even more money. All on our dime. IT SUCKS!

[353FMG]

>>Sorry, but we need a revolution. Vote them all out in 2010.”<<

.
A total crew change in congress can only be an improvement.

[cripplecreek]

I’m confused. Should I vote for a former congressman who has a long history of those listed ideals or should I say screw him and consider him an incumbent and let the marxist win?

[dsc]

“8 kids - that’s right 8; all illegal anchor babies and she had the nicest nails, cell phone, hand bag, clothing, etc. “She makes about $1,500 monthly for each”

Send her to Idaho, where she’ll get for 8 kids, let me see, carry the seven, oh, yes: nothing.

[BARLF]

That happened in my state in 2006. I was depressed for months, not likely to ever forget it.

[cripplecreek]

Fortunately my former congressman is leading the early polls by around 10 points and has picked up the endorsements of a couple of our current congressmen.

He wouldn’t be a former congressman if the NRCC hadn’t stripped him of funding two weeks before the last election. They called him a lost cause and he lost by a whopping 2% in this traditionally republican district.

[tflabo]

War on ALL Dems and RINO’s. Kick them ALL out of office! Phoney Blue Dogs included!

[annieokie]

This can be stopped. Make those Queens name the father before they can get welfare. If they won't name the animal, they WILL not get any help.

It is time we put a stop to this and the above solution is the only one that will do it. Those TOM cats are out every night dropping their seed.

CAll it the "Name the Papa" bill, make them pay or go to jail.

[CincyRichieRich]

Great post...I have a request:

Do we have a website (conservative, of course), that has a link to a table that was built with the latest primary and general election tracking and opinion poll tracking all in one place or all in one table?

We have a guy who tracks Obama’s daily approval ratings, and perhaps we can put that in this handy dandy table as well...does it exist???

[Springfield Reformer]

A great sentiment, but we do have an identification problem. As cripplecreek suggests, an absolute rejection of all incumbents would just be a continuation of our already prolonged electoral stupidity. We need to properly tag the targets and take them out surgically. We want the patient to survive the operation.

[JLLH]

Not “incumbents” per se, but those who are liberal and arrogant towards their constituents. Vitter, for example, is neither - although he’s an incumbent. He needs to be re-elected. He’s one of the most conservative Senators in Congress - and consistently so.

[VRWC For Truth]

Juan McAmnesty is #1 on the list. The rest will fall like dominoes and resign.

[cripplecreek]

Here’s a democrat turned RINO, turned independent that needs to be made into a trophy before he does any more damage. Democrats would likely vote for him because they don’t have a viable candidate for the governors chair this time around.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2441520/posts

[ViLaLuz]

“She makes about $1,500 monthly for each”

This can’t be true. What are the facts here?

[RobinOfKingston]

I’m confused. Should I vote for a former congressman who has a long history of those listed ideals or should I say screw him and consider him an incumbent and let the marxist win?

Support the best candidate between the two, incumbent, former, new guy ... whatever he is.

Just replacing people, however, will not fix the problem. The system is broken, and needs lots of repair. It is not in the best interest of incumbents (remember, after the new guy is elected, he becomes an incumbent) who want to get reelected to fix the system.

It is up to all of us to turn the heat up and keep it there.

[danamco]

Makes me wonder too!!!

[Sun]

Vote in the PRIMARIES to get rid of RINOs.