[john drake]

Otis, “U da man.” But seriously, I would’ve thought he’d need to seek the right to defend himself with a handgun in the range of a 9mm or better, rather than a .22 plinker pistol.

[Yorlik803]

In that ‘hood”, maybe a M4 and ten 20 round mags would be better.
Welcome to the innercity, brought to you by the deomcrats and other welfare state lovers. No White people after 9pm.

[Shooter 2.5]

He’s 76 years old for crying out loud.

It may also be part of the lawsuit. The other side can’t argue against assault weapons or heavy calibers.

[Still Thinking]

Heller was smallball in a sense. Federal enclave, squeaky clean plaintiff, actually carries a gun legally during the day, etc, thus taking a lot of potentially confounding objections off the table. Maybe that’s what’s at work with the caliber. I can just hear Scalia “You mean you’re afraid of this little old black man owning a 22??”

[wjcsux]

Otis, “U da man.” But seriously, I would’ve thought he’d need to seek the right to defend himself with a handgun in the range of a 9mm or better, rather than a .22 plinker pistol.
When The Supremes overturn the Chicago law, he can get a .44 mag.