Skip to comments.
The Perot Option [Left's Strategy to Divide Us and Keep Power]
NYT ^
| January 28, 2010
| David Brooks
Posted on 01/30/2010 4:54:48 AM PST by cmj328
There is a specter haunting America: the specter of a saner, updated version of Ross Perot. He is lurking out there, ready to ride the free-floating anger and distrust of Washington. He is out there now in one of his homes or private jets, getting madder by the day. He is large of ego, full of money and cranky in mien.
When he enters the arena, hell say that Washingtonians, all of them, are a bunch of failures. Over the past five years, Washington has tried to reform Social Security, immigration, health care and energy policy. All of these efforts have either failed or are close to failure thousands of people working millions of hours and in all likelihood producing nothing.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 3rdparty; davidbrooks; perot; vichyrepublican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
They have outlined their strategy. Let's not fall for it.
1
posted on
01/30/2010 4:54:48 AM PST
by
cmj328
To: cmj328
This is what he has been doing all along. We have his number, and he isn’t running for president anymore, he is the president, and this crap is going to stick to his shoes whether he likes it or not!
2
posted on
01/30/2010 5:02:13 AM PST
by
Dem Guard
To: cmj328
I wish I had those three minutes of my life back after reading that crap.
If I read that right, the author wants Obama to campaign instead of govern for the next three years?
3
posted on
01/30/2010 5:02:29 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
( We are no longer Massholes)
To: cmj328
the gop had better get their act together and fast or this will happen. maybe they want this to happen?
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: cmj328
“
Hes out there that saner Ross Perot. Hes a-comin. The country would be better off if it were you. “ Final proof (if any more proof were needed), that David Brooks is indded a stark raving, lunatic.
Quick, bring on the men in long white coats.
To: cmj328
They have outlined their strategy. Let's not fall for it. ................. I agree, lets make sure a real conservative is nominated and not another John McCain.
To: cmj328
David Brooks, so in love with Obama that he just cant help himself. They both had wet dreams reading Nebur, the well known German philosopher, dont ya know.
8
posted on
01/30/2010 5:04:54 AM PST
by
DeusExMachina05
(I will not go into Dhimmitude quietly.)
To: thecabal
The strategy is not to let them know you have one. I’m sure the blow will come last minute right before the election in november when the rats are reasurred they have divided us.
9
posted on
01/30/2010 5:07:03 AM PST
by
ronnie raygun
(Cockblock the sock puppet in 2010)
To: cmj328
The Teas already fell for it. We must support conservatism not parties!
10
posted on
01/30/2010 5:08:43 AM PST
by
omega4179
(NOT TRUE.)
To: henry_reardon
There is zero chance that its going to happen.
Heck, the Tea Parties strongly backed Scott Brown, and Tea Partiers sent him so much money in online contributions, that he ended his campaign with $4 million in the bank. And the guy is not even conservative in everything. We backed him in order to stop 0bamacre and remove the 60 seat Democratic super majority in the US Senate.
The last thing the Tea Parties are going ton do in 2012, is vote for some Ross Perot. The overriding objective will be to remove 0bozo from power.
David Brooks is simply nuts.
To: omega4179
“The Teas already fell for it.”
When was that?
To: cmj328
0bama will try to employ someone to split the vote against him as Bill Clinton did.
The only way to get him out of office will be for the GOP to nominate a candidate who is not out of touch, old guard, or doesn't inspire broad-based confidence in their own abilities. That means we cannot afford another Dole, McCain, or for that matter Palin.
I think Bob McDonnell is one to watch. We still have some time to figure it out and get it right.
13
posted on
01/30/2010 5:12:17 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(The Emperor has no Cloture)
To: cmj328
Ah yes. Perot initiated the era of Democrat Rule. Perot could never be elected yet managed to convince frustrated people that the Reform Party was viable. Clinton won a plurality of the public in his first run. Smart move by the Obambots to divide the non-left voters. Spin the Tea Party; cultivate division with Astroturf; obfuscate a Republican message.
To: omega4179
The Teas already fell for it. We must support conservatism not parties!
Nope. We must support Conservatism through parties.
The organizational challenges of being truly effective, politically and ideologically, across all levels of government are daunting - to say the least. The GOP has the organizational apparatus in place to do that.
The best way of advancing Conservatism is to take the reins of the GOP from the grassroots and lead it in that direction. Not to go out and support a candidate who we may think is ideologically acceptable but who's first vote each Congress is for Nancy Pelosi to be Speaker or Harry Reid to be Majority Leader.
To: SmokingJoe
Thank you. The Teas were never about R and D's. Just Conservatism. You are right about Scott.
To: counterpunch
That means we cannot afford another Dole, McCain, or for that matter Palin.
We can afford Palin, my FRiend.....
17
posted on
01/30/2010 5:18:45 AM PST
by
GQuagmire
( We are no longer Massholes)
To: counterpunch
“
0bama will try to employ someone to split the vote against him as Bill Clinton did.” Yeah. Like how that tecnqiuque worked for the Democrats in New Jersey and Massachusetts. Not!
The independents in both NJ and Mass, who were supposed to take votes away from the Repunloican candidate, ended up getting clobberedd but good. The independent candidate in New Jersey, Daggett, who was polling as high as 18% just a few weeks before the elections, ended up getting only 5.8% of the vote, and lost most of his supporters to the Republican Charlie Christie, who won by a solid 4.3%.
This is not 1992.
Voters nowadays, are not as stupid as you think they are.
To: cmj328
First, who is the “us” they are dividing? If it’s a reference to Republicans vs. Tea Party Conservatives, they are already quite divided in general. Republicans need to decide if they will be Conservative or not.
On the other hand, it only takes a few hotheads like I’ve seen on other threads that want to throw Sarah Palin under the bus for campaigning for McCain to sink our efforts before we even get started good.
Allow for some disagreements and differences, without compromising your pivotal values. The principles are the key, but insisting on perfect conformity will short circuit all we want to accomplish. The Leftists KNOW this.
19
posted on
01/30/2010 5:32:00 AM PST
by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: cmj328
Blah blah blah. He say ‘us’ like there is some commonality between RINOs/Republicarats and conservatives. Not hardly.
This anything but Clinton mantra that the GOP has been spouting for 20+ years to scare the rank-n-file is one of the reasons we are now in the shape we are and one of the reasons we end up with GW and MCCain.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson