Although she doesn't articulate she is for legalization, her comments infer very clearly that she is.
It is fairly obvious. As I stated upthread, Texas had a hard time voting for parimutuel betting (with a huge, wealthy lobby behind it) and the lottery. If casinos ever come to this state, I will faint.
I am interested in logistics. (my personal feelings aside)Do you honestly believe Texas would consider voting for a gubernatorial candidate that even entertains the idea of “discussion” of drug legalization?
Or would you prefer a Dem governor? As I have also previously stated, I need to research some of her other opinions before I jump on board.
You’re “inference,” is just that an inference. I could just as easily infer that she is not happy with the RESULTS that the dollars spent on the drug wars have gotten, and that she would like to restructure the drug laws to get better results, WITHOUT legalization. She did not CLEARLY say that she was for legalization.
She is the only candidate that gets the role of government. If you watched those debates and come to the conclusion that you want to vote for Perry or KBH over Medina then I guess I am to the right of you because I see her as the clear choice.
Bringing in the casinos would be awesome!!! That way I don’t have to drive to Louisiana and more business comes to Texas!
This is an awesome video of her presser after the 1st debate.