Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jsdjason
Go back and listen to the first debate. She clearly stated that too much time was spent by law enforcement for drug related crime. And that there should be legalization.

It was an hour debate...I'm not going to post the whole thing.

If you can give me proof to the contrary...?

31 posted on 01/29/2010 11:00:22 PM PST by berdie (Hey, Bill Mahr...That's Mrs. Cracker to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: berdie

You are flat wrong. Here is a link to what you’re referring. I challenge you to find the words “I believe in legalizing drugs” in her answer. You’re clearly misstating her position. All she said was that if she was governor the policy of drug enforcement would be discussed.

And really, what is the problem with discussing it? The current drug war has been far from effective. Drugs are available everywhere. That’s a fact. Clearly something needs to be changed if we’re going to pour so much money into fighting the drug war.

Even if she was for legalization, that’s about the only thing that I could find that I might disagree with her on, and like I said above, I’ll vote for the person that I agree with 80% of the time (Medina), rather than the 2 RINOs.

Here’s the link you’re referring to. Watch it again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2P17JGioTU


36 posted on 01/29/2010 11:33:14 PM PST by jsdjason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson