Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FutureRocketMan
Roeder had to prove his innocence in this case

Er, the guy shot a man down in cold blood in front of dozens of witnesses, and admitted it later. Not sure how he could "prove his innocence" in this case....

Let's face it - Roeder committed murder, and was not "pro-life." Sure, the man he killed was a disgusting, reprehensible piece of human garbage, but that doesn't give Roeder the right to kill him.

24 posted on 01/29/2010 10:15:01 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Would you have a right to kill hitler in the 1930’s, given a chance?

Or would it be wrong, because it was illegal?


137 posted on 01/29/2010 11:59:54 AM PST by patton (Obama has replaced "Res Publica" with "Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

“Er, the guy shot a man down in cold blood in front of dozens of witnesses, and admitted it later. Not sure how he could “prove his innocence” in this case....”

If the defense is “justifiable homicide” then being technically guilty of the act doesn’t come into it.

Kansas didn’t allow for that kind of defense apparently, so Roeder will have to be satisfied being judged by a “higher authority.” As will we all.


339 posted on 01/30/2010 2:57:25 AM PST by PLMerite (Ride to the sound of the Guns - I'll probably need help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

ok... I’m sorry to pick your comment for my response, but I can’t stand it anymore. I know I maybe justifying vigilanism here, but so be it.

Scott Roeder had the will to do what must have been done. There is no reason why a murder like Tiller should evade the law and continue his murder. Now, regardless of that ideal, The trial was reprehensible. The judge did not allow a charge of “voluntary manslaughter”, which under Kansas law, as I understand it, could be sought, to be raised. In that case, where there is a legitamate but unreasonable moral belief (like Roeder’s) to take out someone from society because of the heinous physical harm they have done to society, the conviction should not have been of first degree (cold-blooded) murder. This was morally motivated.

To say that this man should be treated like a normal murderer is just plain wrong. the only way to make this trial an unbiased one is to resolve the issue of late-term abortion, which, in several states, is ILLEGAL. The local courts were the wrong place for this trial.

I am glad Roeder killed Tiller. It was about time. He has now saved thousands of unborn children. This trial should be appealed and the state (or jury selectors) sued. I will continue to support Roeder.


439 posted on 01/30/2010 6:04:53 PM PST by FutureRocketMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson