Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus
>> 10th cousins may not share any DNA, unless they are descended in the direct male line from a common ancestor and share the same Y chromosome <<

Almost, but not quite. They also could share mtDNA, if both descend in an unbroken female-to-female line from a common 9th-great-grandmother.

Moreover, total genome "sample scans" sold by the firms 23andMe and deCODEme now are sometimes able to pick up shared DNA as far as eight generations back, no matter that the ancestral trails involved are mixed between males and females. For example, my own 23andMe DNA results show a "haploblock in common" with a known sixth cousin -- whose paper trail back to our common 5th-great-grandfather passes thru several female ancestors.

Now to be sure, these total genome scans (based BTW on the Illumina chip technology) aren't yet as reliable for genealogy as are the standard Y-chromosome and mtDNA tests. But when the cost of total genome sequencing -- as opposed to today's "sampling" -- falls down to ca. $100.00 per shot, then we might be able to do reliable DNA tracing back to the generation of our 9th-great-grandparents. I guess we'll just have to be patient for another five or ten years!

45 posted on 01/29/2010 11:15:24 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Hawthorn
I had forgotten about mitochondrial DNA. Of course it's hard to know from genealogical records that you have common ancestors in a direct female line 10 generations back, because the records are less complete for women and the surnames keep changing, unless you are descended from royalty or upper ranks of the nobility.

I attended a family reunion several years ago where I was struck by the resemblance among many of the cousins who may have been fourth, fifth or sixth cousin (last common ancestor was in the 18th century), and living in widely separated areas so not likely to have common ancestry on other lines.

47 posted on 01/29/2010 1:05:18 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Hawthorn
I had forgotten about mitochondrial DNA. Of course it's hard to know from genealogical records that you have common ancestors in a direct female line 10 generations back, because the records are less complete for women and the surnames keep changing, unless you are descended from royalty or upper ranks of the nobility.

I attended a family reunion several years ago where I was struck by the resemblance among many of the cousins who may have been fourth, fifth or sixth cousin (last common ancestor was in the 18th century), and living in widely separated areas so not likely to have common ancestry on other lines.

48 posted on 01/29/2010 1:07:18 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson