Wow. The biggest brown-noser for JOHN MCCAIN has the nerve to call Tom Campbell a LIBERAL. THAT’S TOO RICH.
DeVore is at 6%
Campbell 30%
Issues that Tom Campbell would be a “No” vote whereas Boxer would be a “Yes”:
Universal Healthcare
Cap & Trade
More Stimulus
Deceptive Anti-jobs legislation
Reduced military funding
Reduced national security
Illegal Immigration/Amnesty
Water rationing in central CALIFORNIA
I ask you, are these not the most important issues facing the United States today?
Having Tom Campbell as a California Senator would be LIGHT YEARS better than “Mamm” Boxer. And right now, it looks like a good possibility. GET REAL, FOLKS!
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus
Tom Campbell is a liberal. Socially and fiscally. John McCain has a record of voting against big government even when everyone else in his party was voting march step with Bush such as with the medicare drug benefit. I judge liberal versus conservative based on voting record alone. John McCain has been very wrong on some issues but at least he has come around on illegal immigration, he is a social conservative both pro life and opposes special rights for sexual activists. I wonder sometimes whether some of the people that frequent FR are not simply moles trying to sow discord while pushing agendas contrary to the conservative cause. Tom may not be the worst we could get but he is nearly the worst and since we have a good solid conservative candidate who is balanced and shares our values Campbell should stay out we don’t need ex butt kissers of Grey Davis and Arnie Climatnator. Mr. Campbell also is a big supporter of the CA version of CAP and Trade AB 32. Don’t tell me how great he is.
http://www.camajorityreport.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&aid=4113&ptid=9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the immortal words of Senator Byrd: "WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!" Campbell would only be marginally better than Boxer. He was one of the worst RINO's in the House.
I would not consider him trustworthy enough to even caucus with the Republicans: he voted against the House Republican nominee for speaker one year. If the Republicans should take control of the Senate by a single vote, he'd be highly likely to switch to independent or Rat, and vote with the Rats to organize the Senate.
Campbell is staunchly and consistently pro-abortion and pro-gay. Given his leftist views on social issues, he would not be a reliable vote for conservative judges in the upcoming Republican administration.