I'm fond of that fact, as well. You must have seen the proposal to put ships in the ocean designed to blow sea water in the air to make clouds to shield us from the sun's rays :-)
Of course, I'm still waiting for an explanation about how CFCs manage to eat only ozone way up in the atmosphere, completely ignoring the ozone at ground level that causes bad-air days :-) (oh, and an explanation about how ice-core samples show flowers used to grow at the North Pole, what caused the glaciers to melt before there were SUVs, etc, etc...)
Etc, etc, etc, etc. The Eocene thermal maximum was the last extreme global warming period that didn’t involve any SUVs at all. How can that be? And there is no real evidence that CFCs are punching holes in the ozone layer. The one over Antarctica has been there since we’ve been able to even measure it. According to the scare tactics a couple decades ago, New England was supposed to have its own ozone hole by now.
I haven’t heard about the proposal to make artificial clouds. Figures, though, that liberals would want to intentionally screw with the ecosystem they say we’re damaging just by breathing. Clouds, however, are not the same as water vapor, they are water droplets. Water vapor is invisible. Clouds actually reflect sunlight back into space, so they do in fact reduce “global warming”. There’s an interesting concept associated with that, however. The hotter the earth gets, the more clouds might form as a result of water vaporizing, and so reflect more sunlight and cool it again. Sort of a Gaia effect, if you know what I mean. I personally don’t think we have to worry about the earth running amok on us no matter what we do. There’s no evidence that we do, anyway.