Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats fall as fast as Nixon Republicans in 1974
Washington Examiner ^ | 1/26/10 | Michael Barone

Posted on 01/26/2010 8:26:19 PM PST by Nachum

Republican Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts' special Senate election was for Democratic leaders a moment that can be described in two words, of which I will only print the first here, which is "oh."

Left-wing bloggers, liberal columnists and the stray Nobel Prize winner-turned polemicist are all urging Democrats in Congress to pass, somehow, some way, a health care bill, and many of them are calling for a second and even larger stimulus bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; barone; betterdeadthanred; commie; democrats; fall; killacommieformommy; nixon; pelosi; reid; republicans; socialist

1 posted on 01/26/2010 8:26:22 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Left-wing bloggers, liberal columnists and the stray Nobel Prize winner-turned polemicist are all urging Democrats in Congress to pass, somehow, some way, a health care bill, and many of them are calling for a second and even larger stimulus bill.

Yep, that's worked so well for em. Might as well spend another trillion or so.

Oh, and don't forget to "TAX THE RICH" that's the key.

2 posted on 01/26/2010 8:29:26 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
As Michael Barone has observed, losing a special election is a big deal. A Republican loss in 1974, presaged the GOP bloodbath in the autumn. The Democrats face a similar grim fate this year unless they turn their policies around. So far there's no sign of that happening.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find only things evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelogus

3 posted on 01/26/2010 8:32:49 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Leftists have demanded that Democrats adhere to their socialism. And that has killed the Democratic Party.

Americans are not a socialist people. We are a nation of people who make it on our own, and expect nothing more of the government other than security, law, and to stay out of our way.

Yet the Che-T-Shirt fringe has used the Democratic Party to shove their Marxism on us. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barak Obama are their vanguard. They force Lenin, Fidel and Mao on Americans, who are the people of Teddy Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan. We are better dead than red.

If those Democrats who aren’t marxists don’t stand up and take their party back, it will die. And if it dies, so be it. Don’t say I didn’t warn them.


4 posted on 01/26/2010 8:38:09 PM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Republican Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts' special Senate election was for Democratic leaders a moment that can be described in two words, of which I will only print the first here, which is "oh."

Actually, the second vulgar unprintable word can be easily left out, with the first becoming the second and an new first word in its place:

"Utttt Oh"


5 posted on 01/26/2010 8:39:03 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’d be happy with a 1946. Republicans + 13 in the Senate, and + 55 in the House. That would give us an 8 seat margin in the Senate, and a 28 seat margin in the House.


6 posted on 01/26/2010 8:40:44 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No one, absolutely no one, knows each and every Congressional District, its demographics, and history, like Barone. If he sees something big coming in September, you can take it to the bank. The Charlie Cook backup reinforces that pretty strongly.


7 posted on 01/26/2010 10:32:42 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Leave it to Barone to draw the most insightful conclusions. Many miles between here and November. Let us hope that we get a good crop of conservatives - not just pubs.

And no RINOs.


8 posted on 01/26/2010 11:19:13 PM PST by karnage (worn arguments and old attitudes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Others are holding out against the bloggers. Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that "unease would be the gentlest word" to describe House Democrats' refusal to pass the Senate health care bill.

IOW, scared positively witless. LOL!!!!

9 posted on 01/27/2010 12:29:58 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Prayers for the Ft. Hood families, victims and soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karnage

On another thread, the topic was Mark Levin’s endorsement of JD Hayworth in AZ v. McCain. That is the way to do it.

If you recall in the primaries leading to the 2008 election, NONE of the conservative talk radio guys would step forward with an endorsement, “oh, I’m friends with ALL of them.” I think they have lived to regret that indecision, and are now dedicated to helping the more conservative candidates in the primaryies where it counts.


10 posted on 01/27/2010 1:33:34 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Photobucket

JFK was more conservative than Nixon. If he were alive today he would be labeled as a right wing tea bagger who wanted tax cuts and a strong national defense.

Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA and countless federal agencies that exist to this day.

Forget the D and R next to their name. I wasn't alive in 1960 but reading their words and legislation I can come to no other conclusion. Anybody have something to refute or add?

11 posted on 01/28/2010 3:27:21 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; Nachum; goldstategop
No one, absolutely no one, knows each and every Congressional District, its demographics, and history, like Barone. If he sees something big coming in September, you can take it to the bank. The Charlie Cook backup reinforces that pretty strongly.

With more idiotic economic, security and foreign policies, those estimates of rat losses could be low balls.

12 posted on 01/28/2010 3:29:48 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Yep. Nowadays, JFK couldn’t even be in the Republican party, as they’d denounce him as being too far-right to be ‘electable’.


13 posted on 01/28/2010 3:40:56 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084
Big difference between 1960 and 1970. In 1960 John Kennedy took the position that the offshore islands of Qemoy and Matsu were "indefensible" against attack by Red China. Fortunately, despite sustained artillery bombardment, China did not have the means to take the islands. If they could have, they would have, and we would have had the Sino-American War. Nixon knew better in 1960.

As Vice President, Nixon faced down Kruschchev in the famous "kitchen debates." Kennedy was all for "negotiation," which ended with his humiliation at the Vienna summit. He also failed to respond, even to come back to Washington from vacation, when the East Germans and Soviets threw up the Berlin Wall. When the Soviets moved missiles into Cuba, Kennedy promised Cuba immunity from future invasion or subversion, as the price of USSR removing their missiles. That's why we never flicked the little skeeter Castro off our butt when we easily could have.

Jack Kennedy was no McGovernite, to be sure, but like every other Kennedy, he was lotsa talk and little walk.

14 posted on 01/28/2010 5:08:43 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Thanks for the insight.


15 posted on 01/29/2010 2:56:23 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Beware of the Socialist Government-Academia Grant Junkie-Rich "non-profit"-Liberal Media Complex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Many people ask me whether the Democrats are in as much trouble as they were in 1994. The numbers suggest they are in much deeper trouble, at least at this moment.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Democrats-fall-as-fast-as-Nixon-Republicans-in-1974-82731837.html#ixzz0e6jXnsBi

As long as Obama is in office, we will need to keep the pressure on.

16 posted on 01/30/2010 6:55:01 AM PST by GVnana ("Obama is incredibly naive and grossly egotistical." Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson