Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ACORN foe James O'Keefe arrested by FBI in plot to bug Landrieu's office
Washington Post ^ | 1/26/10

Posted on 01/26/2010 6:43:50 PM PST by FromLori

The conservative young filmmaker who tarnished the reputation of a liberal activist group with his undercover videos has been arrested for allegedly trying to bug Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu's office in New Orleans.

Federal investigators allege that James O'Keefe was among a group of four men who created a ruse to enter Landrieu's downtown office for the supposed purpose of repairing the lawmaker's telephones. O'Keefe and another man, Stan Dai, are accused of aiding the plot, while two others, Joseph Basel and Robert Flanagan, are accused of pretending to be telephone company employees, according to federal court records (PDF) unsealed today.

All four, including O'Keefe, were arrested Monday and charged by federal prosecutors with entering federal property under false pretenses and with the intent of committing a felony. If convicted, Flanagan, Basel, O'Keefe and Dai face up to 10 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acorn; basel; dai; fbi; flanagan; jamesokeefe; josephbasel; landrieu; marylandrieu; okeefe; robertflanagan; standai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: pray4liberty

Between the Republican Federal Prosecuter in New Orleans and a local a jury, i’m sure they will find the truth.


81 posted on 01/26/2010 9:17:19 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Bears repeating:

His ego has outweighed his common sense.

82 posted on 01/26/2010 9:17:34 PM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
"Right now technically James can bring his ACORN sting into the case, along with more *discovery* from this case."

I'm not sure how many cases you've prosecuted, but I've prosecuted a bunch. I can't see any way ACORN - in any manner - comes into this "case", whatever this case is. Furthermore, if you think that discovery will yield a trove of treasure with respect to either ACORN or information about Mary Landriue's goings-on, you have absolutely no idea how discovery works.

83 posted on 01/26/2010 9:19:36 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"Right now they are only guily of gaining unlawful access to a federal building by portraying themselves as phone company workers."

Right now they're looking at ten years each - perhaps more if they find themselves at the business end of an enterprising prosecutor. Just wait until the grand jury is involved.

This was stupid, stupid, stupid. Any competent attorney who had even a little experience in media cases could have given them badly needed advice with their last set of adventures, and told them - unequivocally - that playing college pranks in a Senator's official offices is a big time no-no.

84 posted on 01/26/2010 9:24:28 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Depends on the jury.. if there IS one..... ha ha.


85 posted on 01/26/2010 9:25:48 PM PST by txhurl (O'Keefe has some Freeper rats worried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Why don’t we just wait and see. The only info we have is from the MSM. Remember when the AP reported the Weekly Standard reporter “slipped and fell” when the video clearly showed him being pushed. There’s video to this too and my guess is many here are jumping the gun here.


86 posted on 01/26/2010 9:35:36 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
"Depends on the jury.."

Depends on the jury? What? Juries don't make determinations with respect to discovery motions, judges do. In criminal cases, discovery refers to the mandated sharing of information between prosecution and defense. Any information, to include exculpatory information held by the prosecution, must be shared with the defense.

Subpoenas issued for personal or confidential information - to especially include the victim(s) - may only be done so with a court order. Before such an order is granted, the victim may move to quash such a subpoena.

87 posted on 01/26/2010 9:39:38 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
I can't see any way ACORN - in any manner - comes into this "case", whatever this case is.

What if O'Keefe has evidence of wrongdoing between ACORN and Landrieu? After all, ACORN is based in New Orleans.

88 posted on 01/26/2010 9:40:17 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"The only info we have is from the MSM."

No, we have the a copy of the actual sworn affidavit by the investigating officer. In my professional opinion - even in the absence of grand jury investigation - the people's case is on the stronger side. The agent has attested that at least two of the accused have confessed to gaining entry under false pretenses.

There's no allowable affirmative defense that says - "Hey, but we meant well" That's arguing for jury nullification, and it's illegal. Having said that, I doubt that the prosecutor will take them to the wall over this - unless of course they actually develop compelling evidence that they were trying to bug the place. I think a more likely outcome is a plea agreement to some misdemeanor(s) and a fine.

89 posted on 01/26/2010 9:45:59 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

My point being there will be be no prosecution, ergo no jury.

Do you REALLY think an accomplished sting operator goes for even bigger fish on a whim, with no legal direction?

Like he just got lazy or stupid or something once he accomplished, publicly, his first goal?

Hopefully he can drop what he’s got prior to the state of the bozo address tomorrow.


90 posted on 01/26/2010 9:48:52 PM PST by txhurl (O'Keefe has some Freeper rats worried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"What if O'Keefe has evidence of wrongdoing between ACORN and Landrieu? After all, ACORN is based in New Orleans."

It would have to be VERY compelling evidence for a judge to allow a jury to hear it. Even then, one crime doesn't excuse another, so it's relevance to their guilt or innocence is suspect, if also possibly beneficial at sentencing.

There are PLENTY of cases where FBI agents broke wiretapping laws on some very bad people who I'm sure that were guilty of some very bad things, but that doesn't inoculate the FBI agents from the crime of an illegal wiretap.

91 posted on 01/26/2010 9:50:49 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
"Do you REALLY think an accomplished sting operator goes for even bigger fish on a whim, with no legal direction?"

He clearly didn't consult with counsel prior to his last round of documentaries. If he had, he wouldn't have recorded conversations in states requiring "two or all party" consent. It's not even my area of practice, and I was WELL aware of the legal limitations of surreptitious recordings of in-person conversations. I would hope that he would have learned his lesson, but this doesn't seem likely as he's already been arrested.

92 posted on 01/26/2010 9:54:46 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
I've read the affidavit and, yes, Flanagan and Basel apparently admitted to impersonating phone employess. But the agenet also says O'Keefe and Dai aided and abetted them "to permit the entry for the purpose of interfering with the phone system". As a prosecutor, does "intefering" mean planting a bug? Or could it be any number of things?

Getting back to ACORN as I asked before: What if O'Keefe has evidence of wrongdoing between ACORN and Landrieu? Or at least evidence of a relationship between the two? After all, ACORN is based in New Orleans. Would it be possible to somehow bring that in as evidence and hence bring in ACORN itself?

Perhaps the Senator was using her office to help ACORN inappropriately in there litigation dealings with O'Keefe. I'm not an attorney so I call upon your expertise.

93 posted on 01/26/2010 9:57:44 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I guess what I’m saying is regardless of the legalities of impersonating phone company employees, maybe O’Keefe and friends simply wanted to appear to be bugging the phones. For what reason, I’ve no idea but I think there’s way more to this than meets the eye.


94 posted on 01/26/2010 10:00:59 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"As a prosecutor, does "intefering" mean planting a bug? Or could it be any number of things?"

No. In fact, if they had established (or do establish) that they were in possession of an actual listening device, the the charges and corresponding penalties become much worse. I don't have the relevant statutes memorized, but "interfering" comes in the same section as "tampering with", which could mean either destroying, disabling or otherwise interfering with the operation of equipment.

"Would it be possible to somehow bring that in as evidence and hence bring in ACORN itself?"

Highly unlikely.

95 posted on 01/26/2010 10:02:35 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"maybe O’Keefe and friends simply wanted to appear to be bugging the phones."

Now, that is likely. I would be surprised beyond all description if they were actually trying to bug - or even really interfere with - the Senator's phone system. I can't believe they'd be that stupid. But, that doesn't mean that whatever they did, no matter how well-intentioned, wasn't violating the letter of the law.

This really will come down to how motivated the US Attorney is, and how pissed Landrieu is. If she wants to make this an issue, look out. It is VERY difficult to escape the fangs of a prosecutor with the taste for your blood - just ask Scooter Libbey.

96 posted on 01/26/2010 10:06:42 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: blake6900

Some people are anxious for O’Keefe’s VERITAS, some people dread it.

The ones who dread it on this thread and others regarding the case... well, I think they doth protest too much.


97 posted on 01/26/2010 10:06:42 PM PST by txhurl (O'Keefe has some Freeper rats worried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Highly unlikely.

OK...thanks for the info. BTW, is this affidavit typical of an FBI affidavit? In other words, is it usual for it to be so vague as to times and places, when or how the FBI was informed of a possible crime, etc. It seems rather poorly written and not extremely detailed.

98 posted on 01/26/2010 10:06:50 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: blake6900
"OK...thanks for the info. BTW, is this affidavit typical of an FBI affidavit? In other words, is it usual for it to be so vague as to times and places, when or how the FBI was informed of a possible crime, etc. It seems rather poorly written and not extremely detailed. "

Yep, very typical. This isn't the indictment. This is just an affidavit establishing probable cause so that the magistrate will issue an arrest warrant. With this affidavit, he meets probable cause, easily and that ALL he's looking for.

99 posted on 01/26/2010 10:11:22 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Thanks. It’s been a pleasure.


100 posted on 01/26/2010 10:12:59 PM PST by blake6900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson