Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

Presuming that they were caught before they could actually accomplish what they were up to, isn’t this really just a trespassing charge? Doesn’t sound like hard time to me.

Of course he should’ve come up with a legal way to get whatever he was after... but I wonder what sort of trail they are on with Landrieu. She’s corrupt as they come. I wonder what they had on her.


30 posted on 01/26/2010 4:24:30 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius
"Presuming that they were caught before they could actually accomplish what they were up to, isn’t this really just a trespassing charge?"

Lipstick on a pig.

However, I am really curious to what they were after. It seemed like a curious caper with high degree of "daytime" failure. So would need a back up plan, if caught. Testing security within a federal building?[excuse]

There were witnesses as seen in the affidavit [I supplied link above], guess it will be up to the feds, as it is a FEDERAL OFFICE.

Male(s) enters federal building with hard hat; alleges telephone repairman; Arab clean shaven, but can see where once was beard (sun); the other male blond wth blue eyes; carrying telecom equipment of some kind. No credentials "left in truck", no appointment--what would you do if your Federal office?

"caught before they could actually accomplish what they were up to"

I think that means GOOD security, not like the "crotch bomber" with lapsed security at the highest levels.

32 posted on 01/26/2010 4:56:36 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson