Perhaps that is possible, but it has nothing to do with the case at hand which has to do with private citizens allegedly attempting to wiretap telephone owned by the federal government.
| > but it has nothing to do with the case at hand which has > to do with private citizens allegedly attempting to > wiretap telephone owned by the federal government. "Private citizen" or "citizen journalist" ... If a few people hadn't been so courageous in defying the laws of the land that protected a corrupt government, you'd be saying, “God save the Queen” instead of standing up for the rights of the $300 million Cajun queen ... like you are now asserting YOUR First Amendment rights: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2438227/posts?page=21#21 |