Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
"Mr. Hamblen averred that he and the soldiers under his command qualified as a militia and thus were authorized to own military grade automatic weapons."

I was sympathetic until I read this.

8 posted on 01/26/2010 5:12:59 AM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: verity

Anything that strengthens individual rights over the collectivist government is good. The government MUST fear the people.


10 posted on 01/26/2010 5:43:10 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verity
"Mr. Hamblen averred that he and the soldiers under his command qualified as a militia and thus were authorized to own military grade automatic weapons." I was sympathetic until I read this.

Yep, he fell back on the liberals intepretation of the 2nd as being a collective right that only applies to militia and trying to define the National Guard as Militia when it clearly is not. Plus there is no collective right but an individual right to bear arms.

27 posted on 01/26/2010 7:43:45 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verity
I was sympathetic until I read this.

Yeah. I pretty much agree with you there.

He should have simply argued that they were 'arms' and that's specifically what the 2nd protects.

I'd also mention the fact that unless we, as citizens can own superior weaponry, then Letters of Marque would make no sense from a Constitutional standpoint.

28 posted on 01/26/2010 7:49:43 AM PST by zeugma (Proofread a page a day: http://www.pgdp.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson