That is not likely to happen. Those who use these terms, just because one merely critiques Palin, are of a definite minority (amongst Palin's supporters) but very vocal.
The irony is that the tactics they claim to abhor, they use themselves against the "Paulistas" and "Romneyites". It's oft like watching an Our Gang/Little Rascals episode.
Then a few of them are outright creepy in how they've made Palin the center of their universe. Wouldn't surprise me if a few had a life-sized cutout of her --- and actually spoke to it as if it were human.
I'm sure Mrs Palin appreciates the great majority of those supporting her, and winces at the thought of some.
True. Hardly a compelling argument. Especially in cases where
no evidence of support for Paul or Romney exists.
It's been done to me and I just have to laugh at the absurdity.
Paul is a nut with his "Reagan sucked" and "9-11 was an inside job" crap.
I laugh even harder when accused of Romney support. I've yet to
come up with an acceptable way to explain that I am an anti-Mormon
bigot who makes fun of Romney's magical underpants. But I'll keep trying.
Then a few of them are outright creepy in how they've made Palin the center of their universe.
Also true. I pointed this out months ago and got slammed for it.
By you yourself, if I remember correctly! ;-)
I'm sure Mrs Palin appreciates the great majority of those supporting her, and winces at the thought of some.
No doubt. I'm sure she does not want blind worshipers.
Also of note is the oh-so-sly "Who do YOU support" tactic.
I'll usually ask for a list of who is running, that I might choose one.
Ain't seen it yet.