I'm going back to square one. I'm going to try to allow you to explain your quote to me. My original question was what are the neo-con lies about wars? It was simple, direct, non-threatening, and came with no strings attached.
You never answered.
Are you asking me about my post in #61 copied here again or another reply? :” Ron Paul’s importance is he exposes the neo-con’s lies about wars and massive welfare being free. That is where I agree with him. Neo-con’s bankrupted the country and called the debt ‘economic growth’. ” at #61 and repeated at #124 and #127